ome_companion_utils: fix z_spacing #197
Merged
+953
−5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #197 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.75% 92.90% +0.14%
==========================================
Files 64 64
Lines 3920 3930 +10
Branches 246 246
==========================================
+ Hits 3636 3651 +15
+ Misses 269 265 -4
+ Partials 15 14 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
imagejan
force-pushed
the
ome-companion-z-spacing
branch
2 times, most recently
from
fbeddf1
to
42b2872
Compare
Previously it could happen that we get an array of type object, containing dict_values([...]).
imagejan
force-pushed
the
ome-companion-z-spacing
branch
from
42b2872
to
c740ae7
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously it could happen that we get an array of type
object, containingdict_values([...]).