You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently core providers are entried in freedom with the prefiex core.; unfortunately, this makes them impossible to be given clean type interfaces (strongly type systems do not allow multi-type arrays as multi-typed collections are bad coding-style: indexes are not food syntax to indicate type).
It would avoid the need for a gross hacky rename prefix file for that binds every core.XXX to core_XXX if freedom just used the core_XXX style to start with. Or even better: freedom.coreProviders.XXX and freedom.providers.XXX and freedom.rawModule.XXX (for just on/emitable things).
What do you think? :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently core providers are entried in freedom with the prefiex
core.
; unfortunately, this makes them impossible to be given clean type interfaces (strongly type systems do not allow multi-type arrays as multi-typed collections are bad coding-style: indexes are not food syntax to indicate type).It would avoid the need for a gross hacky rename prefix file for that binds every
core.XXX
tocore_XXX
if freedom just used thecore_XXX
style to start with. Or even better:freedom.coreProviders.XXX
andfreedom.providers.XXX
andfreedom.rawModule.XXX
(for just on/emitable things).What do you think? :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: