-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added callback specs #176
Open
sgalpha01
wants to merge
3
commits into
ga4gh:develop
Choose a base branch
from
sgalpha01:draft
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
added callback specs #176
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -146,6 +146,23 @@ paths: | |
application/json: | ||
schema: | ||
$ref: '#/components/schemas/tesCreateTaskResponse' | ||
callbacks: | ||
statusChange: | ||
'{$request.body#/callback_url}': | ||
post: | ||
description: |- | ||
The TES server will send notifications to the callback URL, if provided, | ||
when the task status changes. | ||
requestBody: | ||
content: | ||
application/json: | ||
schema: | ||
$ref: '#/components/schemas/tesCallbackStatus' | ||
responses: | ||
204: | ||
description: |- | ||
Listener should return this HTTP status code if | ||
the payload was received successfully. | ||
x-codegen-request-body-name: body | ||
/tasks/{id}: | ||
get: | ||
|
@@ -219,6 +236,19 @@ components: | |
- FULL | ||
|
||
schemas: | ||
tesCallbackStatus: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. How will the the callback know which TES server is making the request? Is the callback expected to look at the Origin header (but I don't think that's guaranteed to be set)? |
||
type: object | ||
required: | ||
- id | ||
- state | ||
properties: | ||
id: | ||
type: string | ||
description: Task identifier assigned by the server. | ||
example: job-0012345 | ||
state: | ||
$ref: '#/components/schemas/tesState' | ||
description: Notification that a task has changed state. | ||
tesCancelTaskResponse: | ||
type: object | ||
description: CancelTaskResponse describes a response from the CancelTask endpoint. | ||
|
@@ -654,6 +684,12 @@ components: | |
type: string | ||
description: |- | ||
Optional user-provided description of task for documentation purposes. | ||
callback_url: | ||
type: string | ||
format: uri | ||
description: |- | ||
Optional user-provided callback URL. | ||
example: https://myserver.com/send/callback/here | ||
inputs: | ||
type: array | ||
description: |- | ||
|
@@ -740,7 +776,7 @@ components: | |
This is set by the system, not the client. | ||
example: 2020-10-02T10:00:00-05:00 | ||
readOnly: true | ||
description: Task describes an instance of a task. | ||
description: Task describes an instance of a task. | ||
tesTaskLog: | ||
required: | ||
- logs | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This cool feature was mentioned at the GA4GH call, so I took a peek... I'm curious, how is authentication supposed to work for the callback url?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
github allows a simple password for webhooks but does not require it. I wonder if the callback should be an object instead of a single url:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The idea here was not to put callback url behind extra authentication (the URL itself might be a secret?) and additionally advise consumers of the callback to verify the information by hitting the GET endpoint.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aniewielska thanks for the clarification. I wonder if it would still potentially make sense to make this an object to future proof in the case of wanting to add additional access mechanisms in the future
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be nice to have your clarification in the spec.
I'm still slightly concerned about needing to expose a public callback url without auth, and I think Patrick's proposal addresses that, but I don't feel too strongly (and I'm not a reviewer anyway, just lurking :) ).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good points here, thanks. Agree with future proofing by making it an object and extending the description to clarify that clients should verify the info from the callback and that the callback URL may include a secret