Performance: Running gap on Windows vs running on linux implementation on same hardware #5228
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
This raised an interesting answer, as the answer is different to what I thought it was (and I'm going to try and investigate why that is the case). Short answer: One of the easiest ways to get the "best of both worlds" is to install the Windows Subsystem for Linux (look for "ubuntu" in the windows app store). This will install a well-integrated Linux VM on your windows machine, and in that the performance is (on my computer) actually faster than booting into "true" linux (I think because Windows does better at managing my machine's CPU / heat production). The "windows installer" version of GAP has two issues:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This may be a naïve question, but I'll ask it anyway. If I'm running on current but medium performance x86 hardware, should I run gap as configured for Windows or set up a linux machine on the same hardware. All of my tools are currently on the Windows side, but I'm open to change if the performance gains are large enough. If they are only incremental, it's not worth it except for the education value.
Background--I am a very experienced Windows programmer who is fascinated with basic Group Theory but most of my context in my real world has not needed a great deal of performance.
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions