-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Data from database different than model returns #246
Comments
It does seem tho that looking up this family like this: FamilyModel.first({id: query, disabled: false}, {includes: ['users', 'familyMemberships']}, function (err, familyModel) {
if (err) return callback.call(this, createResponse.error());
if (!familyModel) return callback.call(this, createResponse.error(404, 'No family found'));
console.log(familyModel)
}); returns my expected {
"message": "No family found"
} |
oh...I think I may know what it is... is afterCreate supposed to fire even on reads? It appears as tho it's firing "create" on associated models. This is why it works if you hit it directly, but if you ask for the association its like its creating it new. This also means all my default props im setting in afterCreate are overriding whats actually in the DB |
Yes, create fires even on reads. I'm not sure if this is correct behavior anymore, since we now have the Since the See here, where models are initialized during a query using the create method. I agree that this behavior is confusing though. What do you think @mde? |
@ben-ng afterCreate tho is the suggested way of setting defaults as far as i know. Is there some other method or way in the model to set defaults on create? The hardest part is that this fires only on associated models. If I read Foo model it doesn't fire. If I read Foo model with Bar and Baz associations then Bar and Baz get the create but Foo doesn't. At least if Foo did it then I could account for that a little easier, but currently I have to come up with a way to know if its being called as an association or as a "top level" model. |
So, at least for now and in my case, I'm getting around it with a tiny module: module.exports = function (prop, def) {
return prop === undefined ? def : prop;
}; I use it like var setAsModelDefault = require('../utils/set-as-model-default');
this.afterCreate = function () {
this.disabled = setAsModelDefault(this.disabled, false);
}; Not ideal, but it works for me |
Ahh i see. I'll take a look at making the behavior consistent then. I think the right thing to do is probably to not fire create on reads anymore. Its going to be a breaking change, but its the most logical to me. We should have an init event take its place. Then, init will happen on both queries and user-performed initializations, create only on user-performed initializations, and reify on queries. |
Database shows this in my families table:
When I make this call:
I get this and the disabled prop says 1 (note I removed internal props and methods from this response)
My user model has that property set to a
boolean
, but I also triednumber
. I'm not sure what else to try? I pass modeltrue
/false
and it seems to save the data fine in the database as I can see 1 for true and 0 for false toggles correctly, but getting it always returns 0.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: