Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ButterCMS Updates #37

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

ButterCMS Updates #37

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

lumettak
Copy link

Sources of information for changes:

https://buttercms.com/docs/
https://buttercms.com/features/

@Jotschi
Copy link
Contributor

Jotschi commented May 15, 2020

Thanks for your PR. Please provide links to the features in this format: #30 (comment)

butter-cms.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
butter-cms.json Outdated
"GraphQL [Mutations]": "No",
"GraphQL [Subscriptions]": "No",
"REST API": "Yes",
"REST [Create]": "Yes",
"REST [Read]": "Yes",
"REST [Update]": "Yes",
"REST [Delete]": "No",
"REST [Delete]": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not find the delete REST endpoint.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Working on documenting this one and will get back to you.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can update this in a follow up PR once we're ready.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"REST [Delete]": "Yes",
"REST [Delete]": "No",

butter-cms.json Outdated
@@ -28,56 +28,56 @@
"Search Features [Autosuggestion]": "No",
"Search Features [Result Highlighting]": "No",
"Search Features [Geospatial Search]": "No",
"Search Features [Search within uploads (pdf,doc)]": "No",
"Search Features [Search within uploads (pdf,doc)]": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see where it is mentioned that it is possible to search within the text content of uploaded documents.

Copy link
Author

@lumettak lumettak May 20, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, gottcha. This would remain No for now in this case. Maybe this Feature could be renamed to [Search within text content of uploads (pdf, doc)] to better clarify what this means.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, there are actually a few entries in the list which are not 100% clear. I hope to update the tables in the future to make it less confusing.

"Backup Feature": "Yes",
"Import/Export": "Yes",
"CLI": "Yes",
"SDK [Java]": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Content Migration": "No",
"Workflows": "No",
"Content Model / Schema Versioning": "Yes",
"Content Migration": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -30,54 +30,54 @@
"Search Features [Geospatial Search]": "No",
"Search Features [Search within uploads (pdf,doc)]": "No",
"Image Manipulation": "Yes",
"Image Focalpoint support": "No",
"Image Facedetection": "No",
"Image Focalpoint support": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

@lumettak lumettak May 29, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Image Focalpoint support": "No",
"Image Facedetection": "No",
"Image Focalpoint support": "Yes",
"Image Facedetection": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"SDK [Java]": "No",
"Backup Feature": "Yes",
"Import/Export": "Yes",
"CLI": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Import/Export": "No",
"CLI": "No",
"SDK [Java]": "No",
"Backup Feature": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Butter does automatic backups. https://buttercms.com/security/

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unless you can download the backup I don't see this as a valid feature.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Jotschi you can download backups if the ButterCMS account is on an Enterprise Plan (they setup auto dumps to account holders managed S3 buckets).

"CLI": "No",
"SDK [Java]": "No",
"Backup Feature": "Yes",
"Import/Export": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Web Hooks": "Yes",
"Eventbus": "No",
"Bulk Import": "No",
"Bulk Import": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Client Side Forms": "No",
"Plugin System": "No",
"Customizable UI": "No",
"User Management": "Yes",
"Role Based Permissions": "Yes",
"Document Level Permissions": "No",
"OAuth 2.0 Support": "No",
"Auditing": "No",
"Auditing": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A revision history provides versioning but not auditing as it is meant by this flag.
A system which provides a auditing feature tracks any operation (CRUD) of any object.

"API Keys": "Yes",
"Project Support": "Yes",
"I18N Localized Content": "Yes",
"Content Trees": "No",
"Content Trees": "Yes",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reference field relates to the content relation support. Tree support is used for organizing content elements. I don't see how this can be done. Most systems use a flat hierarchy to manage content elements.

@lumettak
Copy link
Author

Updated based on your feedback. Please take a look and let me know if anything is needed. Thanks!

@lumettak
Copy link
Author

lumettak commented Jun 8, 2020

@Jotschi Just following up on all updates. Can you please review and let me know if there are any more open questions! Thanks.

@Jotschi
Copy link
Contributor

Jotschi commented Jul 7, 2021

@lumettak I have no longer access to this repository since I left Gentics. I suggest you get in touch with Gentics in order to get your PR merged.

@jakelumetta
Copy link

@Jotschi - hi - could you point us to a github username who would be best to review this PR now? Much appreciate any help on this!

@Jotschi
Copy link
Contributor

Jotschi commented Nov 30, 2021

@jakelumetta I think @bernhardriegler or @npomaroli could perhaps help you but I'm not sure whether they get notified. I suggest writing an email to Gentics.

@bernhardriegler
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jakelumetta - thank you for your contribution.
The content seems fine - could you please adapt the structure of the json according to https://github.com/gentics/headless-cms-comparison/blob/master/fields.json
I will be happy to merge it then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants