Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/setup wizard enhancements #3454 #2466

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

mrabbani
Copy link
Member

@mrabbani mrabbani commented Dec 6, 2024

All Submissions:

  • My code follow the WordPress' coding standards
  • My code satisfies feature requirements
  • My code is tested
  • My code passes the PHPCS tests
  • My code has proper inline documentation
  • I've included related pull request(s) (optional)
  • I've included developer documentation (optional)
  • I've added proper labels to this pull request

Changes proposed in this Pull Request:

Related Pull Request(s)

  • Full PR Link

Closes

  • Closes #

How to test the changes in this Pull Request:

  • Steps or issue link

Changelog entry

Title

Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.

Before Changes

Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).

After Changes

Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).

Feature Video (optional)

Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.

PR Self Review Checklist:

  • Code is not following code style guidelines
  • Bad naming: make sure you would understand your code if you read it a few months from now.
  • KISS: Keep it simple, Sweetie (not stupid!).
  • DRY: Don't Repeat Yourself.
  • Code that is not readable: too many nested 'if's are a bad sign.
  • Performance issues
  • Complicated constructions that need refactoring or comments: code should almost always be self-explanatory.
  • Grammar errors.

FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:

As a reviewer, your feedback should be focused on the idea, not the person. Seek to understand, be respectful, and focus on constructive dialog.

As a contributor, your responsibility is to learn from suggestions and iterate your pull request should it be needed based on feedback. Seek to collaborate and produce the best possible contribution to the greater whole.

  • Correct — Does the change do what it’s supposed to? ie: code 100% fulfilling the requirements?
  • Secure — Would a nefarious party find some way to exploit this change? ie: everything is sanitized/escaped appropriately for any SQL or XSS injection possibilities?
  • Readable — Will your future self be able to understand this change months down the road?
  • Elegant — Does the change fit aesthetically within the overall style and architecture?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved setup wizard functionality with clearer step handling.
    • Added new methods for setting steps and retrieving the next step link.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling and validation in the setup process.
  • Refactor

    • Updated variable names for clarity and consistency across multiple classes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve renaming a protected variable from $step to $current_step across multiple classes related to the setup wizard functionality. This update is reflected in the SetupWizard, SetupWizardNoWC, and Vendor/SetupWizard classes, ensuring consistent usage of the new variable name. Additionally, some methods have been adjusted to accommodate this change, including the introduction of a new method for setting steps in the Vendor/SetupWizard. Overall, the control flow and functionality remain unchanged, focusing on enhancing code clarity.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
includes/Admin/SetupWizard.php Renamed protected variable $step to $current_step; updated references in constructor and methods.
includes/Admin/SetupWizardNoWC.php Replaced $this->step with $this->current_step in setup_wizard_content method.
includes/Vendor/SetupWizard.php Renamed $step to $current_step; added methods get_next_step_link() and set_steps(); refactored logic for step handling and error validation.

Possibly related PRs

  • [Fix] Deprecated Noticed on Admin Setup Wizard #2414: This PR modifies the SetupWizard.php file, specifically updating variable references from $this->step to $this->current_step, which directly relates to the changes made in the main PR where $step was renamed to $current_step.
  • Fix admin fixed commission setting validation #2437: This PR also involves changes to the SetupWizard.php file, particularly in the dokan_setup_commission_save method, which includes validation logic that may interact with the setup process, linking it to the overall functionality of the setup wizard.
  • Fix commission upgrader #2463: This PR modifies the commission handling in various classes, including changes in how commission values are processed, which could be relevant to the setup wizard's functionality regarding commission settings.

Suggested labels

QA approved, :+1: Dev Review Done, Upcoming Release

Suggested reviewers

  • shohag121

Poem

In the wizard's dance, we hop and play,
Renaming steps to brighten the way.
Current steps now take the lead,
Clarity blooms like a springtime seed.
With each little change, our code takes flight,
Hopping towards a future so bright! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 490a380 and e35a0c3.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • includes/Admin/SetupWizard.php (7 hunks)
  • includes/Admin/SetupWizardNoWC.php (1 hunks)
  • includes/Vendor/SetupWizard.php (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Run PHPCS inspection
includes/Vendor/SetupWizard.php

[failure] 509-509:
Mixing different binary boolean operators within an expression without using parentheses to clarify precedence is not allowed.

🔇 Additional comments (4)
includes/Vendor/SetupWizard.php (1)

12-13: Ensure all references to $step are updated to $current_step

The property $step has been renamed to $current_step. Please verify that all references to $step within this class hierarchy have been updated to prevent any undefined variable errors.

You can run the following script to check for any remaining references:

✅ Verification successful

Property has been correctly renamed and all references are updated

Based on the search results, I can confirm that all references to the property have been properly updated to use $current_step. The search shows that:

  1. In includes/Vendor/SetupWizard.php, all references use $this->current_step
  2. The only occurrences of $this->step are in a different class (SetupWizardWCAdmin.php), which is a separate implementation and not part of this class hierarchy
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find references to `$this->step` in PHP files.

rg "\$this->step" --type php

Length of output: 29


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for both old and new property names
# and include some context lines for better understanding

# Search for any reference to step or current_step as class properties
rg -A 3 -B 3 "protected\s+\$(?:current_)?step" --type php

# Search for any usage of either property
rg -A 3 -B 3 "\\\$this->(?:current_)?step" --type php

Length of output: 11673

includes/Admin/SetupWizardNoWC.php (1)

76-82: Ensure all references to $step are updated to $current_step

Similar to previous changes, the variable $this->step has been replaced with $this->current_step. Please verify that all instances of $step have been updated throughout the codebase to prevent any issues.

includes/Admin/SetupWizard.php (2)

15-15: Confirm PHP version compatibility with type hints

The addition of the string type hint to the protected property $current_step requires PHP 7.1 or higher. Ensure that the project's minimum PHP version supports this feature to avoid compatibility issues.

You can check the project's PHP version requirement by reviewing the composer.json file or consulting the project's documentation.


15-15: Ensure all references to $step are updated to $current_step

As in other files, the property $step has been renamed to $current_step. Please verify that all references to $step have been updated to maintain consistency and prevent errors.

}
else {
if ( ( isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && count( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] ) || ( ! isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] ) ) ) ) {
} elseif ( ( isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && count( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] ) || ( ! isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] ) ) ) ) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add parentheses to clarify operator precedence

The condition on line 509 mixes && and || operators without parentheses, which can lead to confusion due to operator precedence rules. It's recommended to add parentheses to make the logic explicit and maintainable.

Apply this diff to clarify the condition:

- } elseif ( ( isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && count( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] ) || ( ! isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] ) ) ) ) {
+ } elseif (
+     (
+         isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] )
+         && count( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] )
+         && empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] )
+     )
+     || (
+         ! isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] )
+         && empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] )
+     )
+ ) {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
} elseif ( ( isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && count( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] ) || ( ! isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] ) && empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] ) ) ) ) {
} elseif (
(
isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] )
&& count( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] )
&& empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] )
)
|| (
! isset( $states[ $dokan_settings['address']['country'] ] )
&& empty( $dokan_settings['address']['state'] )
)
) {
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Run PHPCS inspection

[failure] 509-509:
Mixing different binary boolean operators within an expression without using parentheses to clarify precedence is not allowed.

@mrabbani
Copy link
Member Author

mrabbani commented Dec 6, 2024

Duplicate PR: #2467

@mrabbani mrabbani closed this Dec 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants