Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Magik language support #6488

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ajhoward2
Copy link

@ajhoward2 ajhoward2 commented Jul 24, 2023

Add a new programming language to Linguist, called Magik.

Description

Magik is a hybrid procedural and object-oriented language implemented as part of Smallworld Geographical Information System (GIS) and is provided by General Electric. Magik shares similarities with Smalltalk in terms of architecture and language features, providing readable syntax and an interactive development environment.

Checklist:

@ajhoward2 ajhoward2 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2023 17:44
vendor/grammars/magik-vscode:
- source.magik
- text.definition
- text.message
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These text ones seem erroneous - only source.magik is used.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your feedback! I agree with this statement, however was unsure if I should modify grammars.yml as this was automatically generated by the scripts.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do not manually modify this file. It's maintained by a script and should remain that way. The script will always find all grammars in the repo and add them to this file so there's nothing wrong with this.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just from feedback I've gotten in my own PRs, I'm pretty sure that a 3000+ line sample is too large 🙂

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the tip! I will remove it.

@Alhadis Alhadis changed the title Adding language: Magik Add Magik language support Jul 28, 2023
@sebastiaanspeck
Copy link

Is this PR still alive? I am working on a tree-sitter with a colleague of mine for Magik, which will improve the parsing of Magik even more. It would be great if Magik will be supported by linguist. It is already added to Rouge 5 years ago, which is used by GitLab.

@ge-timothy-chueh
Copy link

I believe it's still "Pending Popularity". @lildude apologies if this is documented somewhere, is there specific criteria we should try to meet to satisfy the popularity requirement?

@lildude
Copy link
Member

lildude commented Jan 16, 2024

I believe it's still "Pending Popularity". @lildude apologies if this is documented somewhere, is there specific criteria we should try to meet to satisfy the popularity requirement?

Yes. See the CONTRIBUTING.md file and the issue it references.

@sebastiaanspeck
Copy link

I believe it's still "Pending Popularity". @lildude apologies if this is documented somewhere, is there specific criteria we should try to meet to satisfy the popularity requirement?

Yes. See the CONTRIBUTING.md file and the issue it references.

Thank you, could you re-assess this PR since it has almost 1000 code search results.

@lildude
Copy link
Member

lildude commented Jan 16, 2024

Thank you, could you re-assess this PR since it has almost 1000 code search results.

It'll be re-assessed when I'm close to making a new release, but even without looking, this doesn't meet the doc'd requirements detailed in the issue referenced in the CONTRIBUTING.md file.

@sebastiaanspeck
Copy link

sebastiaanspeck commented Jan 16, 2024

Thank you, could you re-assess this PR since it has almost 1000 code search results.

It'll be re-assessed when I'm close to making a new release, but even without looking, this doesn't meet the doc'd requirements detailed in the issue referenced in the CONTRIBUTING.md file.

I would like to help to update this PR to meet the doc'd requirements. Are we talking about the same issue? #5756.
Magik is a somewhat closed environment and not much open-source code will be found online since most customers/users are network operators that use GIS/Smallworld and those companies are regulated via the public authorities.

I hope we can reach consensus and maybe make an exception for this language?

@lildude
Copy link
Member

lildude commented Jan 16, 2024

I'm referring to #5756

We've always relied upon public repo usage (we can't measure private repo usage) and allowing exceptions "just this once" opens us up to a similar time-consuming fight each and every time someone develops "the next greatest thing, promise on my hamster's life" or adds support for a lesser used langauge. Sticking with a consistent policy ensures fair treatment of all and everyone knows what the expectations are.

@sebastiaanspeck
Copy link

I'm referring to #5756

We've always relied upon public repo usage (we can't measure private repo usage) and allowing exceptions "just this once" opens us up to a similar time-consuming fight each and every time someone develops "the next greatest thing, promise on my hamster's life" or adds support for a lesser used langauge. Sticking with a consistent policy ensures fair treatment of all and everyone knows what the expectations are.

What is the "normal" search query for number of files per extension? If we include forks, we already have 1K files.

@sebastiaanspeck
Copy link

Magik has been added to sourcegraph lately and opened sourcegraph/zoekt#790 to include any languages that linguist won't/don't support right now.. It would be for the best if linguist adds Magik-support

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants