You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Quick question: Is it intended that on Arm the user should build from source?
What happens currently is that the plugin is able to be downloaded and "installed" OK via AssetLib or the GitHub release (and the extension file says there's a path for a Linux Arm64 binary), but Godot gives the same error message about no VCS plugin in the project like it would if nothing is installed, and – importantly – searching for that error message or for installation instructions doesn't turn up any mentions of Arm one way or the other.
(But if I look in the folders, the Linux Arm binary isn't in the release or the AssetLib download.)
I imagine anyone running Linux on an Arm device is going to know how to build software from source; just wondering if this was intentional, or if the user experience / documentation could be improved if so.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Official Linux ARM builds could be provided, but the buildsystem code likely needs some changes to do this. This is already supported on the GDExtension side, but I assume the SCons code in this extension is outdated.
Windows ARM could be looked into at the same time.
Calinou
changed the title
Arm (Linux) support
Provide compiled libraries for Linux ARM
Oct 26, 2024
Calinou
changed the title
Provide compiled libraries for Linux ARM
Provide compiled libraries for Linux/Windows ARM
Oct 26, 2024
Quick question: Is it intended that on Arm the user should build from source?
What happens currently is that the plugin is able to be downloaded and "installed" OK via AssetLib or the GitHub release (and the extension file says there's a path for a Linux Arm64 binary), but Godot gives the same error message about no VCS plugin in the project like it would if nothing is installed, and – importantly – searching for that error message or for installation instructions doesn't turn up any mentions of Arm one way or the other.
(But if I look in the folders, the Linux Arm binary isn't in the release or the AssetLib download.)
I imagine anyone running Linux on an Arm device is going to know how to build software from source; just wondering if this was intentional, or if the user experience / documentation could be improved if so.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: