Replies: 1 comment
-
I found a bit of prior art that uses the Chromium project instead:
https://style.mla.org/citing-source-code/, so I think something like that
would be fine with "S2 Authors" instead. Otherwise no strong opinions from
me :)
…On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 9:15 AM Christopher Krapu ***@***.***> wrote:
What would be the best way to cite this work? Currently, I was planning to
do this:
S2 Developers. “S2 Geometry Library,” http://s2geometry.io/. Accessed
January 14, 2024.
Is there a more appropriate article or set of authors to list?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#340>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGEMKWX5JTELHAN27S7PF3YOVIZXAVCNFSM6AAAAABB3QR3BOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGA4DEMZTGUZDMNY>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
What would be the best way to cite this work? Currently, I was planning to do this:
S2 Developers. “S2 Geometry Library,” http://s2geometry.io/. Accessed January 14, 2024.
Is there a more appropriate article or set of authors to list?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions