Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
At Grafana, we do the latter, render yaml in CI and let Flux handle the rest. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
Thanks! Why not save the export in a folder in the same repo rather than a
different one?
…On Fri, Mar 10, 2023, 1:33 PM Duologic ***@***.***> wrote:
In general it's tk export and commit that to git, every commit to master
on the source has a commit on the master of the repo containing the export.
CI gets serialized to prevent race conditions. PRs create branches on the
export repo and the CI job comments a link to diff the output, this gives a
very useful feedback loop.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#740 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADDZTBJLNDCUT2URVL64RS3W3OM2HANCNFSM556LBRVA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey guys,
Like the project, but I was thinking if there are any plans about developing Tanka operator(for example as an extension to flux ecosystem)?
Currently the only way I can see this happening is having a CI that exports manifests and commits them(then flux takes over).
Let me know what you think
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions