Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate django-simple-history for history tables #181

Open
7 tasks
Tracked by #37
fyliu opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 6 comments
Open
7 tasks
Tracked by #37

Evaluate django-simple-history for history tables #181

fyliu opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
complexity: medium draft This issue is not fully-written feature: DB design ready for dev lead role: back end s: PD team stakeholder: People Depot Team size: 3pt Can be done in 13-18 hours

Comments

@fyliu
Copy link
Member

fyliu commented Aug 11, 2023

Overview

We would like to know if django-simple-history can fulfill our needs of keeping history of certain tables. We can potentially save time and developer efforts.
The package automatically keeps track of change history metadata like who made the change.

Details/Requirements

Action Items

Resources/Instructions

@fyliu fyliu added role: back end size: 3pt Can be done in 13-18 hours feature: DB design s: PD team stakeholder: People Depot Team labels Aug 11, 2023
@fyliu fyliu added this to the v0.01 - initial setup milestone Aug 11, 2023
@fyliu fyliu mentioned this issue Aug 11, 2023
33 tasks
@fyliu

This comment has been minimized.

@ExperimentsInHonesty

This comment has been minimized.

@fyliu

This comment has been minimized.

@fyliu
Copy link
Member Author

fyliu commented Jun 27, 2024

I updated the Details section with information on whether I think the library can help what that table needs. It turns out that information was at the bottom of the issue description.

@fyliu
Copy link
Member Author

fyliu commented Aug 9, 2024

I came across other potential solutions that I need to compare with this package. Setting this for dev-lead.

@shmonks
Copy link
Member

shmonks commented Oct 17, 2024

@fyliu I'm just looking through the Ice Box - since this issue is the sole remaining dependency on #37, I wonder whether it's time to prioritize it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
complexity: medium draft This issue is not fully-written feature: DB design ready for dev lead role: back end s: PD team stakeholder: People Depot Team size: 3pt Can be done in 13-18 hours
Projects
Status: 🆕New Issue Review
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants