You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have used the vault-best-practices/operations/provisioning for AWS as a starting point and have been looking to upgrade it (and subsequent modules) to align with 0.12. (0.11 works well)
As you already know, in 0.12 there are reserved variables, for-loops, if statements, and various other changes regarding input variable types and how they are interpreted. I see "TODOs" in the comments.
One change I am trying to understand is rational behind supporting the use of ec2 instance tags?
What is the use of having a list(string) or "tags_list" and map(string) "tags" in consul-aws? Is this just to support re-use in parent projects that may have either? The descriptions are the same, so I'm wondering if vault best practices actually uses them or both in some way?
@bensojona This is more of a general question than a bug/feature needing a PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
consul-aws/variables.tf
Line 149 in e57139b
I have used the vault-best-practices/operations/provisioning for AWS as a starting point and have been looking to upgrade it (and subsequent modules) to align with 0.12. (0.11 works well)
As you already know, in 0.12 there are reserved variables, for-loops, if statements, and various other changes regarding input variable types and how they are interpreted. I see "TODOs" in the comments.
One change I am trying to understand is rational behind supporting the use of ec2 instance tags?
What is the use of having a list(string) or "tags_list" and map(string) "tags" in consul-aws? Is this just to support re-use in parent projects that may have either? The descriptions are the same, so I'm wondering if vault best practices actually uses them or both in some way?
@bensojona This is more of a general question than a bug/feature needing a PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: