You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the intended role of the "Endorsements" section on the homepage?
I was wondering whether it would be good to have Well-Typed add an endorsement. I originally thought that the answer is "no", because it would be better to have endorsements by "end users" of Haskell, i.e., companies that actually develop products in Haskell on their own, as opposed to consultancies.
But then I noticed that there are consultancies (e.g. Serokell, Stack Builders) in the list. So is there an official policy / guideline about this? Would a PR adding an endorsement from Well-Typed be accepted?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't think we have a policy, per se. Currently all Haskell-using companies are welcome. We would definitely accept a PR adding an endorsement from Well-Typed!
Hi! I am just starting to contribute to the platform and would like this to be a learning experience. Since I am not directly associated with Well-Typed, can I help with adding this endorsement to the website? Please let me know if that is okay!
What is the intended role of the "Endorsements" section on the homepage?
I was wondering whether it would be good to have Well-Typed add an endorsement. I originally thought that the answer is "no", because it would be better to have endorsements by "end users" of Haskell, i.e., companies that actually develop products in Haskell on their own, as opposed to consultancies.
But then I noticed that there are consultancies (e.g. Serokell, Stack Builders) in the list. So is there an official policy / guideline about this? Would a PR adding an endorsement from Well-Typed be accepted?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: