-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Difference between bin/bs_call and gemBSbinaries/bs_call? #96
Comments
Looks like |
gemBS should use the binaries in gemBSbinaries. As for your original
question about the difference between bin/bs_call and
gemBSbinaries/bs_call, I think that that is a question for the maintainer
of the conda package.
Yours,
Simon
…On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 12:17 AM Diana Lin ***@***.***> wrote:
Does gemBS call use gemBSbnaries/bs_call instead of bin/bs_call?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#96 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAY465ZSAHKDIDS6ULO5LHLWLEWYRANCNFSM6AAAAAASQGRFAQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hi Simon, Thank you. I see that another package called
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
What is the difference between these two binaries?
I've noted that the first one does not have options such as
-O
and--contig-sizes
.The .vcf generated by
bin/bs_call
is also empty compared to that ofgemBSbinaries/bs_call
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: