-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 581
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is there a way to determine how far along the search indexing has progressed? #378
Comments
Totally — that makes sense. I'm gonna leave this issue open and flag it as a "help wanted" for the time being. I'm glad to hear this is (mostly) working as expected on your windows machine! I'm unclear about what the bottleneck is for that startup time (i.e. if it's network time, or if the indexers take a while due to the size of your repo, etc), but if you have any intuitions there, I'd love to hear them. If you're really struggling for a loading indicator in the interim, it could be worth teeing these logs through a script that counts "Searcher started for" log lines for you. |
The 799 of our repos I'm targeting average about 462 files per repo. That doesnt seem out of the "medium" size range, so i suspect its just the number of repos that it has to index and possibly network speed (speed test reports ~80 Mbps down). Is there a specific log message to look for when the Web UI is ready? |
Yes! I believe the |
GH built in search is really buggy lately and burned me twice in the last week, so I'm giving hound a try. I added all my org's repos to the config, set the max indexers to 20, and its going through the repos but I dont know how far along it is or how long it has left to complete.
I thought that I could count the number of data folders but that more than the number of repos currently (~1300 repos, > 1400 folders). I did have to stop and restart houndd because running 20 indexers was making other programs slow.
Is there a way to tell roughly when I can start using the indexed results?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: