You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now that dhstore supports non-encrypted lookups (dhfind), there is no need to separate dhstore backends and not-dhstore backends, unless we intend to allow mixed dh and non-dh storage deployments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We need to keep the ability to specify separate backends as long as we continue to provide support for both double-hashed and non-double-hashed storage. There are at least two situations where an indexer operator may need this:
When maintaining existing indexers with non-double-hashed storage and adding new indexers that do double hashed indexing.
When assigning some publishers to indexers that use double-hashed storage, and other publisher to indexers that do not.
Now that dhstore supports non-encrypted lookups (dhfind), there is no need to separate dhstore backends and not-dhstore backends.
This assumes there is no support for mixed dh and non-dh storage deployments.
Fixes#153
Now that dhstore supports non-encrypted lookups (dhfind), there is no need to separate dhstore backends and not-dhstore backends.
This assumes there is no support for mixed dh and non-dh storage deployments.
Fixes#153
Now that dhstore supports non-encrypted lookups (dhfind), there is no need to separate dhstore backends and not-dhstore backends, unless we intend to allow mixed dh and non-dh storage deployments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: