Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Numbers od pairs #236

Open
BigT-CZE opened this issue Aug 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Numbers od pairs #236

BigT-CZE opened this issue Aug 22, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@BigT-CZE
Copy link

Hello, I have to say, I love your strategy. Thank you for your work. I would like to ask you about number of pairs. Why do you prefere 60-80? Not for example 100? Backtesting with more pairs returns better results, but I suspect that it is losing its accurancy due to its algo how results are calculated.

@iterativv
Copy link
Owner

Hello, thanks. It doesn't matter, the more pairs means more noise. And then we go to low volume pairs too, that can be a little tricky. With 60+ it's all good, that is like 100-120 in backtests (static list).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants