You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the starting point and non-decision time, numerical integration is used (Ratcliff and Tuerlinckx, 2002). This part tends to be the most computationally expensive.
I am going to start with just coding up Simpson's Method. But I figured I would ask if you knew of some alternatives that are notoriously fast in Julia. I was looking at something like HCubature.jl or QuadGK.jl.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for taking the lead on this. From what I understand HCubature.jl is a good option. One thing to be aware of is that this type of numerical integration may not play well with automatic differentiation which is used for some MCMC samplers. My concern is that it might "blow up" the information that AD needs to track. It might be good to ask someone from Turing. This option we discussed in a previous issue might be more AD-friendly.
I am finishing up the DDM with across-trial variability in drift, starting point, and non-decision time.
For drift, you can use analytic integration of the likelihood function. See HDDM for a use case example. That works fine.
For the starting point and non-decision time, numerical integration is used (Ratcliff and Tuerlinckx, 2002). This part tends to be the most computationally expensive.
I am going to start with just coding up Simpson's Method. But I figured I would ask if you knew of some alternatives that are notoriously fast in Julia. I was looking at something like HCubature.jl or QuadGK.jl.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: