You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While the simulation is running, reportingFunction is updated and with each update, the graph is rescaled based upon the entire dataset. The problem with this is when using probes, the first couple of iterations can sometimes have erroneous values that are way outside the scope of actual valves. This can make the graphs unreadable. I can change the scale of the graph but it is erased with the next iteration. If there was a way to keep the manual setting of the graph max/min for the next iteration, that would solve this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If it makes it any easier, you could just skip the first couple of iterations when determining the autoscale as that is where the large deviations occur due to initial convergence.
While the simulation is running, reportingFunction is updated and with each update, the graph is rescaled based upon the entire dataset. The problem with this is when using probes, the first couple of iterations can sometimes have erroneous values that are way outside the scope of actual valves. This can make the graphs unreadable. I can change the scale of the graph but it is erased with the next iteration. If there was a way to keep the manual setting of the graph max/min for the next iteration, that would solve this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: