Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
38 lines (24 loc) · 1.14 KB

generality.md

File metadata and controls

38 lines (24 loc) · 1.14 KB
Raw
date tags
2020-06-16
natural_language

Generality

Event A is more general than event B, iff every instance of B is also an instance of A.

Example from [[[normalized_legal_drafting_query_method]]]

  • "penalty" is more general than "fine"
  • "penalty" is more general than "imprisonment"

Colloquial usage of "generalization"

Paraphrased from a Finnish source, so trust my word. :-P /Inari

Consider the following statements and their (unjustified) conclusions:

  • All humans can walk
    • conclusion: All mammals can walk
  • It's sunny today
    • conclusion: It's sunny always

Despite colloquial usage, these conclusions are not generalisations.

Mammal is a generalization of human, and always is a generalization of today. But the statement "it's sunny always" is not a generalization of "it's sunny today".

In all worlds where it's sunny always, it is also sunny today. So the logically correct direction is:

  • it's sunny today is a generalization of it's sunny always.

Questions

Is this confusion about generality of statements relevant in legal contracts?