Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase size of diagrams #45

Open
bgeorge77 opened this issue Jan 24, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Increase size of diagrams #45

bgeorge77 opened this issue Jan 24, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@bgeorge77
Copy link

I use this PDF with my students in a middle school. They have commented that they think the diagrams aren't big enough, especially compared to the pages from the orginal Byrne which I was giving them. Compare, just as an example, Book 1 Prop 13. The original is much "chunkier" (in the words of my students.) Is it possible to easily change the size of the diagrams, or would that require a complete overhaul?

@jemmybutton
Copy link
Owner

Most of the diagrams are placed on page margins now, because automatic text wrapping doesn't work well with lines of unequal height (such as lines containing pictures). For the sake of convenience for printing on home printers (in Europe) the page is A5 now, and that limits the margin width. I can increase margins and scale up all (but few) diagrams automatically, like so
byrne_context_withlabels.pdf
The ones in the text stay the same though. It is easy to increase, say angle sectors like in prop I:13 in the original, but that would take dealing with every proposition individually and would require extensive layout changes.
If you do need larger diagrams, different page size and major layout changes, i can try and make such a version for you, but i didn't plan to include anything like this in upcoming releases yet.

@jemmybutton
Copy link
Owner

@bgeorge77 here's a cleaned up version with larger angle in most propositions
byrne_context_withlabels_large_diagrams.pdf

@bgeorge77
Copy link
Author

Very nice, much closer to the original, I think.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants