-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduce org.jpmml.evaluator.Transformer
entry point
#96
Comments
The "entry point" of the JPMML-Evaluator library is the
You cannot use the However, you can use the |
org.jpmml.evaluator.Preprocessor
entry point
Reopening this issue, because I might want to do something about it in the upcoming |
I would like to work on this, is there any pointers you could give me ? |
You raised this issue, so you have a use case that needs addressing, not me. The goal is to design an interface similar to The requirement here is to design a "preprocessor schema". It should have at least two schema query methods |
org.jpmml.evaluator.Preprocessor
entry pointorg.jpmml.evaluator.Transformer
entry point
@christophe-rannou : pushing code ? ;-) |
Opened a "request for clarification" at DMG.org's issue tracker to have the entry/exit interfaces of transformer-only PMML documents specified: |
Hi, |
The PMML specification does not define such a workflow. I've asked DMG.org to clarify the situation, but there's been no official response yet (typically takes 2-3 years to obtain it): The JPMML software project can always do a vendor extension. But I don't have a clear use case to base my work upon.
We don't do copy&paste programming in this project. |
Hi,
I have a question which I am not really sure is PMML related or jpmml-evaluator related. I would like to serialize my preprocessing tasks through PMML. So far I succeded in parsing my preprocessing tasks using the TransformationDictionnary and to output the desired processed field through Output when coupled with a MiningModel (such as a tree).
Is it possible to have like an Identity MiningModel to return those field without needing a dummy model to evaluate the PMML ?
The following PMML sums up what I am trying to achieve (not valid since missing a
functionName
):Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: