You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I am quite new to jspsych and webgazer, and I really appreciate what all of contributors have done.
Anyway, I just noticed that I could only use absolute pixel values to adjust sizes of calibration/validation points and ROI radius, while the position of points(dots) could be adjusted using relative values (percent of width and height of client-side screen).
Is there any technical or computational issue that makes it difficult to use relative percent values in customizing size of dots and ROI radius? or is it possible to use relative values if I can customize the plugins (not sure I can manage to do it though)?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello, I am quite new to jspsych and webgazer, and I really appreciate what all of contributors have done.
Anyway, I just noticed that I could only use absolute pixel values to adjust sizes of calibration/validation points and ROI radius, while the position of points(dots) could be adjusted using relative values (percent of width and height of client-side screen).
Is there any technical or computational issue that makes it difficult to use relative percent values in customizing size of dots and ROI radius? or is it possible to use relative values if I can customize the plugins (not sure I can manage to do it though)?
Thanks in advance!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions