You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Coming to junit-pioneer with the @issue annotation, that looks very promising
As pointed out, users would need to provide a custom processor for that:
public class SimpleProcessor implements IssueProcessor {
@Override
public void processTestResults(
List<IssueTestSuite> allResults) {
for(IssueTestSuite testSuite : allResults) {
System.out.println(testSuite.issueId());
}
}
}
I propose to have some configuration options to use some built-in processors like "GitlabJsonRequirements" processor to automatically create a json which could be used in Gitlab CI pipelines
Just for info: I could spend some time contributing, as this feature seems small, and maybe would be better build into junit-pioneer than just randomly in our codebase.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey,
tanks for your feature-request. I can really imagine to support that. To be honest I'm in a low-action-phase and therefore the first version of test-reports are not yet released, but I hope this gives me some upstream.
Aside from that you are free to open a PR if you like!
As we evaluate to use Gitlab Requirements Management I looked to connect them with Junit4/Junit5.
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/requirements/#allow-requirements-to-be-satisfied-from-a-ci-job
Coming to junit-pioneer with the @issue annotation, that looks very promising
As pointed out, users would need to provide a custom processor for that:
I propose to have some configuration options to use some built-in processors like "GitlabJsonRequirements" processor to automatically create a json which could be used in Gitlab CI pipelines
Official Gitlab CI example:
Just for info: I could spend some time contributing, as this feature seems small, and maybe would be better build into junit-pioneer than just randomly in our codebase.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: