-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Checkout overseer.nvim / replace task dispatcher #593
Comments
Is vscode tasks.yml the only way to add more tasks specific to a current directory? |
Tasks:
|
Current problems:
|
Note: overseer's justfile integration even supports parameters and will ask them with overseer's form support. |
Overseer Problems:
|
Side note: overseer finds tasks based on the dir of the current file. This is much better than the one based on current directory. Check if this can make the "Simple*" flavor of asynctask superfluous in subrepo checkouts. |
Is this output of the terminal limited? Or is long output kept? In asynctask with terminal, only 10070 lines are kept. The same applies for overseer. This is controlled by the |
Addition:
|
https://github.com/rockerBOO/awesome-neovim#code-runner lists more options. -> Research more options. asyncrun/asynctask can run a task in a separate pane. But there seems to be no way to populate the quickfix list afterwards when a failure occurred. -> Double check. Overseer.nvim is built upon the idea of using the internal nvim terminal and tightly controlling the process through this. This does not seem to fit the idea of separating the running of processes out to a separate sibling process other than nvim. |
Non of the listed code-runners can launch a separate sibling process / tmux window. Why did I abandon justfiles and vim-dispatch? |
https://github.com/stevearc/overseer.nvim or alternatives.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: