Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Batch map] Consider decompressing by the tar tool instead of Python (should be much faster) #7

Open
karel-brinda opened this issue Mar 28, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

[Batch map] Consider decompressing by the tar tool instead of Python (should be much faster) #7

karel-brinda opened this issue Mar 28, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request low-priority

Comments

@karel-brinda
Copy link
Owner

karel-brinda commented Mar 28, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Should be substantially faster than un-xz-ing in Python
@karel-brinda karel-brinda added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 28, 2022
@karel-brinda karel-brinda changed the title Batch map: evaluate read decompressed tar from standard input [Batch map] Evaluate read decompressed tar from standard input Mar 28, 2022
@karel-brinda karel-brinda changed the title [Batch map] Evaluate read decompressed tar from standard input [Batch map] Evaluate reading decompressed tar from standard input Jul 17, 2022
@karel-brinda
Copy link
Owner Author

The trick is tar -xOvf - this will print all the files in a stream.

@karel-brinda karel-brinda changed the title [Batch map] Evaluate reading decompressed tar from standard input [Batch map] Consider decompressing by the tar tool instead of Python (should be much faster) Jul 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request low-priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@karel-brinda