You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello.
I am using autokeras 0.4.0 on Cifar10 dataset with the 3-layer CNN (CnnGenerator only, no ResnetGenerator or DensenetGenerator) as the base model. I tried to run the experiment for 24 hrs on a single Titan V and the best model I got reached the accuracy around 0.82 while in the autokeras paper, the accuracy should be above 0.88. I am wondering if there are any differences between the implementation in the original paper and autokeras version 0.4.0? Would the gap in results between my experiment and the one from the paper caused by different experiment settings? Any suggestions on this would be very helpful. Thank you for the help!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello.
I am using autokeras 0.4.0 on Cifar10 dataset with the 3-layer CNN (CnnGenerator only, no ResnetGenerator or DensenetGenerator) as the base model. I tried to run the experiment for 24 hrs on a single Titan V and the best model I got reached the accuracy around 0.82 while in the autokeras paper, the accuracy should be above 0.88. I am wondering if there are any differences between the implementation in the original paper and autokeras version 0.4.0? Would the gap in results between my experiment and the one from the paper caused by different experiment settings? Any suggestions on this would be very helpful. Thank you for the help!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions