Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

IRQ save/restore #4714

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

IRQ save/restore #4714

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc[bot]
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: IRQ save/restore
version: 2
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=912852

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: c8d02b5
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=912852
version: 2

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: c8d02b5
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=912876
version: 3

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: c8d02b5
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=912928
version: 4

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: c8d02b5
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=912928
version: 4

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: c8d02b5
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=913219
version: 5

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: c8d02b5
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=913219
version: 5

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: c721d8f
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=913219
version: 5

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=913219 expired. Closing PR.

Kernel Patches Daemon and others added 8 commits December 2, 2024 19:07
adding ci files
ecfb2c8
@kkdwivedi
bpf: Consolidate locks and reference state in verifier state
e542991 
Currently, state for RCU read locks and preemption is in
bpf_verifier_state, while locks and pointer reference state remains in
bpf_func_state. There is no particular reason to keep the latter in
bpf_func_state. Additionally, it is copied into a new frame's state and
copied back to the caller frame's state everytime the verifier processes
a pseudo call instruction. This is a bit wasteful, given this state is
global for a given verification state / path.

Move all resource and reference related state in bpf_verifier_state
structure in this patch, in preparation for introducing new reference
state types in the future.

Since we switch print_verifier_state and friends to print using vstate,
we now need to explicitly pass in the verifier state from the caller
along with the bpf_func_state, so modify the prototype and callers to do
so. To ensure func state matches the verifier state when we're printing
data, take in frame number instead of bpf_func_state pointer instead and
avoid inconsistencies induced by the caller.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
@kkdwivedi
bpf: Refactor {acquire,release}_reference_state
fb5fa3d 
In preparation for introducing support for more reference types which
have to add and remove reference state, refactor the
acquire_reference_state and release_reference_state functions to share
common logic.

The acquire_reference_state function simply handles growing the acquired
refs and returning the pointer to the new uninitialized element, which
can be filled in by the caller.

The release_reference_state function simply erases a reference state
entry in the acquired_refs array and shrinks it. The callers are
responsible for finding the suitable element by matching on various
fields of the reference state and requesting deletion through this
function. It is not supposed to be called directly.

Existing callers of release_reference_state were using it to find and
remove state for a given ref_obj_id without scrubbing the associated
registers in the verifier state. Introduce release_reference_nomark to
provide this functionality and convert callers. We now use this new
release_reference_nomark function within release_reference as well.
It needs to operate on a verifier state instead of taking verifier env
as mark_ptr_or_null_regs requires operating on verifier state of the
two branches of a NULL condition check, therefore env->cur_state cannot
be used directly.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
@kkdwivedi
bpf: Refactor mark_{dynptr,iter}_read
dfefdfd 
There is possibility of sharing code between mark_dynptr_read and
mark_iter_read for updating liveness information of their stack slots.
Consolidate common logic into mark_stack_slot_obj_read function in
preparation for the next patch which needs the same logic for its own
stack slots.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
@kkdwivedi
bpf: Introduce support for bpf_local_irq_{save,restore}
952c435 
Teach the verifier about IRQ-disabled sections through the introduction
of two new kfuncs, bpf_local_irq_save, to save IRQ state and disable
them, and bpf_local_irq_restore, to restore IRQ state and enable them
back again.

For the purposes of tracking the saved IRQ state, the verifier is taught
about a new special object on the stack of type STACK_IRQ_FLAG. This is
a 8 byte value which saves the IRQ flags which are to be passed back to
the IRQ restore kfunc.

Renumber the enums for REF_TYPE_* to simplify the check in
find_lock_state, filtering out non-lock types as they grow will become
cumbersome and is unecessary.

To track a dynamic number of IRQ-disabled regions and their associated
saved states, a new resource type RES_TYPE_IRQ is introduced, which its
state management functions: acquire_irq_state and release_irq_state,
taking advantage of the refactoring and clean ups made in earlier
commits.

One notable requirement of the kernel's IRQ save and restore API is that
they cannot happen out of order. For this purpose, when releasing reference
we keep track of the prev_id we saw with REF_TYPE_IRQ. Since reference
states are inserted in increasing order of the index, this is used to
remember the ordering of acquisitions of IRQ saved states, so that we
maintain a logical stack in acquisition order of resource identities,
and can enforce LIFO ordering when restoring IRQ state. The top of the
stack is maintained using bpf_verifier_state's active_irq_id.

To maintain the stack property when releasing reference states, we need
to modify release_reference_state to instead shift the remaining array
left using memmove instead of swapping deleted element with last that
might break the ordering. A selftest to test this subtle behavior is
added in late patches.

The logic to detect initialized and unitialized irq flag slots, marking
and unmarking is similar to how it's done for iterators. No additional
checks are needed in refsafe for REF_TYPE_IRQ, apart from the usual
check_id satisfiability check on the ref[i].id. We have to perform the
same check_ids check on state->active_irq_id as well.

To ensure we don't get assigned REF_TYPE_PTR by default after
acquire_reference_state, if someone forgets to assign the type, let's
also renumber the enum ref_state_type. This way any unassigned types
get caught by refsafe's default switch statement, don't assume
REF_TYPE_PTR by default.

The kfuncs themselves are plain wrappers over local_irq_save and
local_irq_restore macros.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
@kkdwivedi
bpf: Improve verifier log for resource leak on exit
44bf0b4 
The verifier log when leaking resources on BPF_EXIT may be a bit
confusing, as it's a problem only when finally existing from the main
prog, not from any of the subprogs. Hence, update the verifier error
string and the corresponding selftests matching on it.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
@kkdwivedi
selftests/bpf: Expand coverage of preempt tests to sleepable kfunc
e6b4ae2 
For preemption-related kfuncs, we don't test their interaction with
sleepable kfuncs (we do test helpers) even though the verifier has
code to protect against such a pattern. Expand coverage of the selftest
to include this case.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
@kkdwivedi
selftests/bpf: Add IRQ save/restore tests
ab47e86 
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like
unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ
flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state
on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions,
and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to
demonstrate usage.

#128/1   irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK
#128/2   irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK
#128/3   irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK
#128/4   irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK
#128/5   irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK
#128/6   irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK
#128/7   irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK
#128/8   irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK
#128/9   irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK
#128/10  irq/irq_balance:OK
#128/11  irq/irq_balance_n:OK
#128/12  irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK
#128/13  irq/irq_global_subprog:OK
#128/14  irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK
#128/15  irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK
#128/16  irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK
#128/17  irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK
#128/18  irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK
#128/19  irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK
#128/20  irq/irq_save_invalid:OK
#128/21  irq/irq_restore_iter:OK
#128/22  irq/irq_save_iter:OK
#128/23  irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK
#128/24  irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK
#128/25  irq/irq_ooo_refs_array:OK
#128/26  irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK
#128/27  irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK
#128     irq:OK
Summary: 1/27 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: c721d8f
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=914394
version: 6

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=914394 irrelevant now. Closing PR.

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot deleted the series/911387=>bpf-next branch December 4, 2024 16:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
accepted bpf-next V6-ci-fail V6
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@kkdwivedi