Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider Supporting boxing primitives #1

Open
ecton opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consider Supporting boxing primitives #1

ecton opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ecton
Copy link
Member

ecton commented Feb 13, 2024

This has some syntactic problems we need to solve. For example, if you put a boxed integer in a map, and then overwrite the value in the map, how does the developer distinguish between updating the boxed value and overwriting the map's entry with a new value.

Currently, I'm hoping that this won't be a majorly requested feature, as I don't really want to add a special operator for this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant