Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(STONEINTG-946): migrate redhat-appstudio/konflux-test #1649

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

Josh-Everett
Copy link
Contributor

@Josh-Everett Josh-Everett commented Nov 25, 2024

Update references to redhat-appstudio quay repo to reflect move to konflux-ci org. Existing images have been copied to new repo to maintain functionality.

@Josh-Everett Josh-Everett force-pushed the integration_quay_reorg branch 2 times, most recently from 4040205 to d5e2c7b Compare December 4, 2024 23:26
Copy link
Contributor

@dirgim dirgim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Josh-Everett Josh-Everett force-pushed the integration_quay_reorg branch from d5e2c7b to 9397b2a Compare December 5, 2024 16:27
@Josh-Everett
Copy link
Contributor Author

Most recent update fixes some missing references to appstudio org

@Josh-Everett Josh-Everett requested a review from dirgim December 5, 2024 16:30
dirgim
dirgim previously approved these changes Dec 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@dirgim dirgim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jsztuka
Copy link
Contributor

jsztuka commented Dec 6, 2024

After resolving the conflicts will provide +1.
Question, do we also want to use version 1.4.9 of konflux test image?

@Josh-Everett
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hmm odd, locally those two conflicts have been resolved, will try rebasing my pr and forcing an add here

hongweiliu17
hongweiliu17 previously approved these changes Dec 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@hongweiliu17 hongweiliu17 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

kdudka
kdudka previously approved these changes Dec 9, 2024
dirgim
dirgim previously approved these changes Dec 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@dirgim dirgim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Josh-Everett
Copy link
Contributor Author

Recent update cleared some stale conflicts and moved several references to 1.4.9 (still numerous references to 1.4.8 and other versions remain that haven't been updated in main)

@Josh-Everett Josh-Everett requested a review from dirgim December 9, 2024 16:45
Copy link
Contributor

@dirgim dirgim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@Josh-Everett Josh-Everett force-pushed the integration_quay_reorg branch 2 times, most recently from b7e69e6 to b256d72 Compare December 10, 2024 12:52
@Josh-Everett Josh-Everett force-pushed the integration_quay_reorg branch 2 times, most recently from 3386636 to 1a26259 Compare December 10, 2024 14:33
@Josh-Everett
Copy link
Contributor Author

...another rebase

Update references to redhat-appstudio quay repo to reflect move to
konflux-ci org. Konflux-test image v1.14 used by numerous checks
has additionally been relocated to new repo to maintain
functionality.

Signed-off-by: Josh Everett <[email protected]>
@Josh-Everett Josh-Everett force-pushed the integration_quay_reorg branch from 1a26259 to 5b0c77d Compare December 10, 2024 16:57
@kasemAlem
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@Josh-Everett
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hmm confused by what is blocking this merge at this point - I assumed code owners requirement would be satisfied with @arewm approval. I am wondering if it is because the tasks modified compose several different groups/sections mentioned within the CODEOWNERS and it requires an approver from each section impacted?

@arewm
Copy link
Member

arewm commented Dec 10, 2024

I assume that it requires approval from each relevant set of CODEOWNERS.

Copy link
Contributor

@amisstea amisstea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@avi-biton avi-biton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@kasemAlem kasemAlem added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into konflux-ci:main with commit 0d2ac74 Dec 11, 2024
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.