-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unavailable packages causing build failure #57
Comments
I'm aware of this, I believe this is because https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/3.4/ is unavailable. Not much I can do about it, but you might ask CRAN. Try switching to R-stable or R-patched for the time being. |
Actually, it's not CRAN but R-devel who should be consulted for this (R-devel is R 3.3.0, it's dubious why it's accessing the 3.4 path). |
Oh, I see. Then it's dubious why R-devel is 3.4.0... What's 3.3.x then? |
This seems to get part of the way there but now the |
@jeroenooms: Is the 3.3.0/3.4.0 confusion due to the new toolchain? I guess it would be safest to default to R-patched for now... |
This issue is still a problem and the suggested fixes by krlmlr do not work |
@jaredhuling: Could you point me to a failing build? |
I should have done that initially. Here it is: |
Does it work if you add RcppEigen to the "Imports" of your package? |
Oh, it looks like RcppEigen only has 64-bit libraries. Could you the following setting in appveyor.yml:
See also Line 34 in 7ed23f2
Could RcppCore/RcppEigen#34 be related? |
We do not yet know what RcppCore/RcppEigen#34 actually is as it, not unlike Nessy, has only been spotted in one habitat, the Dortmund CRAN builder. Which has nothing to do with appveyor. So I'd suggest that it may be best not to refer to it at this point. |
@eddelbuettel: Thanks for chiming in. I only observe that RcppEigen_0.3.2.8.1.zip downloaded from CRAN doesn't have a "libs/i386" directory. |
@krlmlr setting to x64 fixed the issue. Thanks |
I am currently having a similar issue where the unavailability of
|
So if you set the env var, your build will continue. @krlmlr maybe you want to set this by default? cc @jimhester |
Thanks, @gaborcsardi! A newer build is continuing as desired. For anyone looking on, I glanced here and set |
Thanks. I'd rather keep the defaults lean, but let's watch how this evolves. Maybe just add support for multiple CRAN-like repos, so that graph and others can be installed automatically? Alternatively, you could use r-appveyor/r-travis/scripts/travis-tool.sh Line 368 in 2ba367d
|
You can also |
Thanks @krlmlr and @jeroen. I may come back to your suggestions depending on how ropensci/drake#41 plays out. Come to think of it, |
Hi all, |
Thanks. Can someone please open a new issue for discussing integration of BioConductor? |
Caught in the crossfire with remotes changing behaviour krlmlr/r-appveyor#57 krlmlr/r-appveyor#127 r-lib/remotes#202
I have had several builds successfully complete previously but suddenly my build is failing complaining about packages not available.
The build page is here
with the relevant lines:
Clearly, these packages should be available as they are all used commonly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: