Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 1, 2022. It is now read-only.

[Feat] Test LightGBM based on XGboost Operator #56

Open
merlintang opened this issue May 9, 2020 · 7 comments
Open

[Feat] Test LightGBM based on XGboost Operator #56

merlintang opened this issue May 9, 2020 · 7 comments

Comments

@merlintang
Copy link
Contributor

LightGBM is also popular for the boosting tree model, thus, it is natural to demo or test how LGBM to run over XGboost Operator.

@issue-label-bot
Copy link

Issue-Label Bot is automatically applying the labels:

Label Probability
kind/feature 0.81
area/operator 0.79

Please mark this comment with 👍 or 👎 to give our bot feedback!
Links: app homepage, dashboard and code for this bot.

@merlintang
Copy link
Contributor Author

merlintang commented May 9, 2020

@XinkaiWang515 and @xfate123

@xfate123
Copy link
Contributor

xfate123 commented May 9, 2020

/assign

@XinkaiWang515
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Member

terrytangyuan commented May 10, 2020

Hmm this is XGBoost operator though. We should probably aim to provide better support and experience for XGBoost users. I don’t think LightGBM would need to be supported here.

@merlintang
Copy link
Contributor Author

merlintang commented May 10, 2020 via email

@merlintang merlintang changed the title Test LightGBM based on XGboost Operator [Feat] Test LightGBM based on XGboost Operator May 11, 2020
@merlintang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Leave this for further work.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants