You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have been trying PANOC to position control a real quadrotor, which was working quite well, however we often saw the need to adding weights on the change of control signal due to some erratic behavior.
The main issue why we simply do not increase the control signal weights is that we still want to tell the solver that large control signal are OK, just that in cannot change instantly.
As the current setup only allows for state weights, I would like to request the additions of a matrix Rd, which is the weight on the rate of change of the control signal.
I did a quick try to implement this, but Pantelis (@alphaville) pointed out that I was changing the continuous time cost function.
I am not familiar with the code generation to add this, but I heard that there was already plans on adding something similar?
BR Emil
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
We have been trying PANOC to position control a real quadrotor, which was working quite well, however we often saw the need to adding weights on the change of control signal due to some erratic behavior.
The main issue why we simply do not increase the control signal weights is that we still want to tell the solver that large control signal are OK, just that in cannot change instantly.
As the current setup only allows for state weights, I would like to request the additions of a matrix
Rd
, which is the weight on the rate of change of the control signal.I did a quick try to implement this, but Pantelis (@alphaville) pointed out that I was changing the continuous time cost function.
I am not familiar with the code generation to add this, but I heard that there was already plans on adding something similar?
BR Emil
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: