You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First off, thank you so much for creating this package. I've been needing something like this and wrote a wrapper with rpy2 but will use this instead from now on.
I am noticing some inconsistencies:
(1) The clustering looks the same but the colors from WGCNA seem to repeat themselves. Is this a WGCNA issue or an artifact of your note:
dynamicTreeCut contains methods for detection of clusters in hierarchical clustering dendrograms. "NOTE: though the clusters match the R output, the cluster names are shuffled"
(2) Can you elaborate on what you mean by the quote above? I keep getting clusters that overlap when I plot them ...
Here is my python representation using the same parameters:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jolespin
changed the title
What is meant by this: dynamicTreeCut contains methods for detection of clusters in hierarchical clustering dendrograms. "NOTE: though the clusters match the R output, the cluster names are shuffled"
What is meant by this?: "NOTE: though the clusters match the R output, the cluster names are shuffled"
Sep 28, 2018
First of all, also from my side, thank you very much for putting this package together! I am intending to use the package for the clustering of pico-earthquakes based on waveform similarity.
To get to know the package, I am currently trying to replicate your example here @jolespin. Assuming that your "R-generated solution" above is correct, I am a little confused, because it seems that your first (black) cluster seems to be different, than the one in the "Python-generated solution". Also in my replicated representation using this package, the black cluster does not appear as you have it in your "R-generated solution" (see below).
Trying to figure out what the cause for that could be, I may just think of the linkage method used in R ("ward.D2") compared to scipy ("ward"). Ultimately, I belief its not the cause because absolute linkage values (y-axis in the above plots) do match. Would anybody have an idea on the cause for this mismatch?
On further, more general question: Where are the leafs, which are not assigned to clusters because "minClusterSize = 10" is too large? Are these the black (R-generated solution) or red (Python-generated solution) leafs?
First off, thank you so much for creating this package. I've been needing something like this and wrote a wrapper with rpy2 but will use this instead from now on.
I am noticing some inconsistencies:
(1) The clustering looks the same but the colors from
WGCNA
seem to repeat themselves. Is this a WGCNA issue or an artifact of your note:(2) Can you elaborate on what you mean by the quote above? I keep getting clusters that overlap when I plot them ...
Here is the link to the dataframe:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vp_jx8CfD90bvFcS6sbWN59U-_DQa48L/view?usp=sharing
Here's my Rcode:
Here is my python representation using the same parameters:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: