Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Redact anonymous attributes within feature events #64

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

keelerm84
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@keelerm84 keelerm84 requested a review from a team January 11, 2024 15:51
Copy link

This pull request has been linked to Shortcut Story #228721: Anonymous attribute redaction for feature events.

@keelerm84
Copy link
Member Author

This change relies on the evaluation change here.

Base automatically changed from mk/sc-223829/inline-contexts to feat/inline-contexts January 16, 2024 15:09
@keelerm84 keelerm84 force-pushed the mk/sc-228721/anonymous-redaction branch from d37f52f to 8250966 Compare January 16, 2024 15:13
@keelerm84 keelerm84 merged commit 1801c39 into feat/inline-contexts Jan 16, 2024
1 check passed
@keelerm84 keelerm84 deleted the mk/sc-228721/anonymous-redaction branch January 16, 2024 15:16
keelerm84 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[2.1.0](2.0.2...2.1.0)
(2024-03-15)


### Features

* Inline contexts for all evaluation events
([#63](#63))
([b31b5e7](b31b5e7))
* Redact anonymous attributes within feature events
([#64](#64))
([66e2e54](66e2e54))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants