Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Invites should be fully public. #8

Open
zippy opened this issue Oct 3, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Invites should be fully public. #8

zippy opened this issue Oct 3, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@zippy
Copy link
Member

zippy commented Oct 3, 2022

I think it's important to make the invitation process fully public (which it of course is internally, but we should make this visible).

So, maybe the group home page should have a membership page that shows:

  • pending invitations and who made the invitation
  • members and who sent them invitations (could be more than one person)

Also I noticed a bug in that I can send invitations multiple times. I think the DNA should not record a second invitation by me.

@matthme
Copy link
Collaborator

matthme commented Nov 29, 2022

I was skimming through the We issues and saw this again. I think it conflicts with the idea to make invitations via seed words because in that case it would be completely opaque where someone got the invitation from. Any thoughts?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants