AMDGPU: Refine gfx950 xdl-write-vgpr hazard cases #117285
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Nov 22, 2024
This was referenced Nov 22, 2024
Merged
This was referenced Nov 25, 2024
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The 2-pass XDL write VGPR, read by non-XDL SGEMM/DGEMM case
was 1 wait state overly conservative. Previously, for gfx940,
the XDL/non-XDL cases happened to have the same number of cycles
in all cases. Now the XDL consumer case has an additional state for
2 pass sources.