Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Depends on deprecated GTK 2 #7

Open
eribertomota opened this issue Nov 11, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Depends on deprecated GTK 2 #7

eribertomota opened this issue Nov 11, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@eribertomota
Copy link
Contributor

eribertomota commented Nov 11, 2021

Hi @lmanul,

This is a summary form a bug sent to Debian[1].

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/967399


GTK 2 was superseded by GTK 3 in 2011 (see https://bugs.debian.org/947713). It no longer receives any significant mainstream maintenance, and in particular does not get feature development for new features like UI scaling on high-pixel-density displays (HiDPI)
and native Wayland support. GTK 3 is in maintenance mode and GTK 4 is approaching release, so it seems like a good time to be thinking about minimizing the amount of GTK 2 in the archive.

A porting guide is provided in the GTK 3 documentation: https://docs.gtk.org/gtk3/migrating-2to3.html


Please, consider to upgrade to a new GTK version.

Regards,

Eriberto

@lmanul
Copy link
Owner

lmanul commented Nov 12, 2021

Isn't that the case for all of GIMP? If I understand correctly, GIMP 3.0 will depend on GTK 3, but the currently stable/supported version is still GIMP 2.10. I don't believe plugins can go any faster than GIMP itself?

@eribertomota
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note that this bug was sent to Debian from Simon McVittie, the maintainer of GTK-3/4 on Debian[1][2]. Thus, this is not my opinion, but the official position of the largest Linux distribution in the world.

[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gtk%2B3.0
[2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gtk4

Regards,

Eriberto

@lmanul
Copy link
Owner

lmanul commented Nov 15, 2021

Okay, maybe my assumptions were wrong then :-) Thanks for the bug report!

@eribertomota
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for your time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants