You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, StreamFlow requires the definition of a framework.yml file to register new components in the framework.
It would allow for much quicker development to also include the ability to define the component settings such as the name/label/description at the class level using custom annotations. In addition, properties could also be annotated used field annotations on the properties directly.
If possible, it would be good to support the annotation approach AND the framework.yml approach in case user's have a specific preference or are working with legacy code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, StreamFlow requires the definition of a framework.yml file to register new components in the framework.
It would allow for much quicker development to also include the ability to define the component settings such as the name/label/description at the class level using custom annotations. In addition, properties could also be annotated used field annotations on the properties directly.
If possible, it would be good to support the annotation approach AND the framework.yml approach in case user's have a specific preference or are working with legacy code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: