Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFC] Support syntax and opcodes from the loongson-community/loongarch-opcodes project #7

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: loongarch-2_37
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

xen0n
Copy link

@xen0n xen0n commented Aug 7, 2021

Default syntax is still vendor syntax, so existing assembly code will not break.

In community syntax mode, the vendor mnemonics are STILL recognized, in addition to the revised mnemonics; but operand ordering and format follow the loongarch-opcodes convention.

  • .community_syntax/.vendor_syntax toggles (inspired by the .att_syntax/.intel_syntax from the x86 port)
  • -msyntax=community|vendor command-line switch for gas
  • Implement .option push/pop from RISC-V (essentially the same as MIPS .set push/pop) for maintaining proper boundaries
  • Test cases
  • Code style cleanups
  • Proper help messages

@xen0n xen0n force-pushed the community-syntax-and-opcodes branch from a4383d5 to e9082ad Compare August 7, 2021 17:10
ChenghuaXu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2021
The original reproducer for PR28030 required use of a specific
compiler version - gcc-c++-11.1.1-3.fc34 is mentioned in the PR,
though it seems probable that other gcc versions might also be able to
reproduce the bug as well.  This commit introduces a test case which,
using the DWARF assembler, provides a reproducer which is independent
of the compiler version.  (Well, it'll work with whatever compilers
the DWARF assembler works with.)

To the best of my knowledge, it's also the first test case which uses
the DWARF assembler to provide debug info for a shared object.  That
being the case, I provided more than the usual commentary which should
allow this case to be used as a template when a combo shared
library / DWARF assembler test case is required in the future.

I provide some details regarding the bug in a comment near the
beginning of locexpr-dml.exp.

This problem was difficult to reproduce; I found myself constantly
referring to the backtrace while trying to figure out what (else) I
might be missing while trying to create a reproducer.  Below is a
partial backtrace which I include for posterity.

 #0  internal_error (
    file=0xc50110 "/ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/gdbtypes.c", line=5575,
    fmt=0xc520c0 "Unexpected type field location kind: %d")
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdbsupport/errors.cc:51
 #1  0x00000000006ef0c5 in copy_type_recursive (objfile=0x1635930,
    type=0x274c260, copied_types=0x30bb290)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/gdbtypes.c:5575
 #2  0x00000000006ef382 in copy_type_recursive (objfile=0x1635930,
    type=0x274ca10, copied_types=0x30bb290)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/gdbtypes.c:5602
 #3  0x0000000000a7409a in preserve_one_value (value=0x24269f0,
    objfile=0x1635930, copied_types=0x30bb290)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/value.c:2529
 #4  0x000000000072012a in gdbscm_preserve_values (
    extlang=0xc55720 <extension_language_guile>, objfile=0x1635930,
    copied_types=0x30bb290)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/guile/scm-value.c:94
 #5  0x00000000006a3f82 in preserve_ext_lang_values (objfile=0x1635930,
    copied_types=0x30bb290)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/extension.c:568
 #6  0x0000000000a7428d in preserve_values (objfile=0x1635930)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/value.c:2579
 #7  0x000000000082d514 in objfile::~objfile (this=0x1635930,
    __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/objfiles.c:549
 #8  0x0000000000831cc8 in std::_Sp_counted_ptr<objfile*, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose (this=0x1654580)
    at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:348
 #9  0x00000000004e6617 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x1654580) at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:168
 #10 0x00000000004e1d2f in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=0x190bb88, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
    at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:705
 #11 0x000000000082feee in std::__shared_ptr<objfile, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=0x190bb80, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
    at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1154
 #12 0x000000000082ff0a in std::shared_ptr<objfile>::~shared_ptr (
    this=0x190bb80, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
    at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr.h:122
 #13 0x000000000085ed7e in __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<std::_List_node<std::shared_ptr<objfile> > >::destroy<std::shared_ptr<objfile> > (this=0x114bc00,
    __p=0x190bb80) at /usr/include/c++/11/ext/new_allocator.h:168
 #14 0x000000000085e88d in std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<std::_List_node<std::shared_ptr<objfile> > > >::destroy<std::shared_ptr<objfile> > (__a=...,
    __p=0x190bb80) at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/alloc_traits.h:531
 #15 0x000000000085e50c in std::__cxx11::list<std::shared_ptr<objfile>, std::allocator<std::shared_ptr<objfile> > >::_M_erase (this=0x114bc00, __position=
  std::shared_ptr<objfile> (expired, weak count 1) = {get() = 0x1635930})
    at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_list.h:1925
 #16 0x000000000085df0e in std::__cxx11::list<std::shared_ptr<objfile>, std::allocator<std::shared_ptr<objfile> > >::erase (this=0x114bc00, __position=
  std::shared_ptr<objfile> (expired, weak count 1) = {get() = 0x1635930})
    at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/list.tcc:158
 #17 0x000000000085c748 in program_space::remove_objfile (this=0x114bbc0,
    objfile=0x1635930)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/progspace.c:210
 #18 0x000000000082d3ae in objfile::unlink (this=0x1635930)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/objfiles.c:487
 #19 0x000000000082e68c in objfile_purge_solibs ()
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/objfiles.c:875
 #20 0x000000000092dd37 in no_shared_libraries (ignored=0x0, from_tty=1)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/solib.c:1236
 #21 0x00000000009a37fe in target_pre_inferior (from_tty=1)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/target.c:2496
 #22 0x00000000007454d6 in run_command_1 (args=0x0, from_tty=1,
    run_how=RUN_NORMAL)
    at /ironwood1/sourceware-git/f34-pr28030/bld/../../worktree-pr28030/gdb/infcmd.c:437

I'll note a few points regarding this backtrace:

Frame #1 is where the internal error occurs.  It's caused by an
unhandled case for FIELD_LOC_KIND_DWARF_BLOCK.  The fix for this bug
adds support for this case.

Frame #22 - it's a partial backtrace - shows that GDB is attempting to
(re)run the program.  You can see the exact command sequence that was
used for reproducing this problem in the PR (at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28030), but in a
nutshell, after starting the program and advancing to the appropriate
source line, GDB was asked to step into libstdc++; a "finish" command
was issued, returning a value.  The fact that a value was returned is
very important.  GDB was then used to step back into libstdc++.  A
breakpoint was set on a source line in the library after which a "run"
command was issued.

Frame #19 shows a call to objfile_purge_solibs.  It's aptly named.

Frame #7 is a call to the destructor for one of the objfile solibs; it
turned out to be the one for libstdc++.

Frames #6 thru #3 show various value preservation frames.  If you look
at preserve_values() in gdb/value.c, the value history is preserved
first, followed by internal variables, followed by values for the
extension languages (python and guile).
ChenghuaXu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2021
With a gdb build with CFLAGS "-O2 -g -flto=auto", I run into:
...
 #7  gdb_main (args=0x7fffffffd220) at src/gdb/main.c:1368^M
 #8  main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at src/gdb/gdb.c:32^M
 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.gdb/selftest.exp: backtrace through signal handler
...
which means that this regexp in proc test_with_self fails:
...
  -re "#0.*(read|poll).*in main \\(.*\\) at .*gdb\\.c.*$gdb_prompt $" {
...

The problem is that gdb_main has been inlined into main, and consequently the
backtrace uses:
...
 #x  <fn> ...
...
instead of
...
 #x  <address> in <fn> ...
...

Fix this by updating the regexp to not require "in" before " main".

Tested on x86_64-linux.
ChenghuaXu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2021
When running test-case gdb.base/break-interp.exp on ubuntu 18.04.5, we have:
...
 (gdb) bt^M
 #0  0x00007eff7ad5ae12 in ?? () from break-interp-LDprelinkNOdebugNO^M
 #1  0x00007eff7ad71f50 in ?? () from break-interp-LDprelinkNOdebugNO^M
 #2  0x00007eff7ad59128 in ?? () from break-interp-LDprelinkNOdebugNO^M
 #3  0x00007eff7ad58098 in ?? () from break-interp-LDprelinkNOdebugNO^M
 #4  0x0000000000000002 in ?? ()^M
 #5  0x00007fff505d7a32 in ?? ()^M
 #6  0x00007fff505d7a94 in ?? ()^M
 #7  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()^M
 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/break-interp.exp: ldprelink=NO: ldsepdebug=NO: \
         first backtrace: dl bt
...

Using the backtrace, the test-case tries to establish that we're stopped in
dl_main.

However, the backtrace only shows an address, because:
- the dynamic linker contains no minimal symbols and no debug info, and
- gdb is build without --with-separate-debug-dir so it can't find the
  corresponding .debug file, which does contain the mimimal symbols and
  debug info.

As in "[gdb/testsuite] Improve probe detection in gdb.base/break-probes.exp",
fix this by doing info probes and grepping for the address.

Tested on x86_64-linux.
lzshhxx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2022
Fedora Rawhide is now using gcc-12.0.  As part of updating to the
gcc-12.0 package set, Rawhide is also now using a version of libgcc_s
which lacks a .data section.  This causes gdb to fail in the following
fashion while debugging a program (such as gdb) which uses libgcc_s:

    (top-gdb) run
    Starting program: rawhide-master/bld/gdb/gdb
    ...
    objfiles.h:467: internal-error: sect_index_data not initialized
    A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
    further debugging may prove unreliable.
    ...

I snipped the backtrace from the above output.  Instead, here's a
portion of a backtrace obtained using GDB's backtrace command.
(Obviously, in order to obtain it, I used a GDB which has been patched
with this commit.)

    #0  internal_error (
	file=0xc6a508 "gdb/objfiles.h", line=467,
	fmt=0xc6a4e8 "sect_index_data not initialized")
	at gdbsupport/errors.cc:51
    #1  0x00000000005f9651 in objfile::data_section_offset (this=0x4fa48f0)
	at gdb/objfiles.h:467
    #2  0x000000000097c5f8 in relocate_address (address=0x17244, objfile=0x4fa48f0)
	at gdb/stap-probe.c:1333
    #3  0x000000000097c630 in stap_probe::get_relocated_address (this=0xa1a17a0,
	objfile=0x4fa48f0)
	at gdb/stap-probe.c:1341
    #4  0x00000000004d7025 in create_exception_master_breakpoint_probe (
	objfile=0x4fa48f0)
	at gdb/breakpoint.c:3505
    #5  0x00000000004d7426 in create_exception_master_breakpoint ()
	at gdb/breakpoint.c:3575
    #6  0x00000000004efcc1 in breakpoint_re_set ()
	at gdb/breakpoint.c:13407
    #7  0x0000000000956998 in solib_add (pattern=0x0, from_tty=0, readsyms=1)
	at gdb/solib.c:1001
    #8  0x00000000009576a8 in handle_solib_event ()
	at gdb/solib.c:1269
    ...

The function 'relocate_address' in gdb/stap-probe.c attempts to do
its "relocation" by using objfile->data_section_offset().  That
method, data_section_offset() is defined as follows in objfiles.h:

  CORE_ADDR data_section_offset () const
  {
    return section_offsets[SECT_OFF_DATA (this)];
  }

The internal error occurs when the SECT_OFF_DATA macro finds that the
'sect_index_data' field is -1:

    #define SECT_OFF_DATA(objfile) \
	 ((objfile->sect_index_data == -1) \
	  ? (internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, \
			     _("sect_index_data not initialized")), -1)	\
	  : objfile->sect_index_data)

relocate_address() is obtaining the section offset in order to compute
a relocated address.  For some ABIs, such as the System V ABI, the
section offsets will all be the same.  So for those ABIs, it doesn't
matter which offset is used.  However, other ABIs, such as the FDPIC
ABI, will have different offsets for the various sections.  Thus, for
those ABIs, it is vital that this and other relocation code use the
correct offset.

In stap_probe::get_relocated_address, the address to which to add the
offset (thus forming the relocated address) is obtained via
this->get_address (); get_address is a getter for m_address in
probe.h.  It's documented/defined as follows (also in probe.h):

  /* The address where the probe is inserted, relative to
     SECT_OFF_TEXT.  */
  CORE_ADDR m_address;

(Thanks to Tom Tromey for this observation.)

So, based on this, the current use of data_section_offset /
SECT_OFF_DATA is wrong.  This relocation code should have been using
text_section_offset / SECT_OFF_TEXT all along.  That being the
case, I've adjusted the stap-probe.c relocation code accordingly.

Searching the sources turned up one other use of data_section_offset,
in gdb/dtrace-probe.c, so I've updated that code as well.  The same
reasoning presented above applies to this case too.

Summary:

	* gdb/dtrace-probe.c (dtrace_probe::get_relocated_address):
	Use method text_section_offset instead of data_section_offset.
	* gdb/stap-probe.c (relocate_address): Likewise.
lzshhxx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2022
g++ 11.1.0 has a bug where it will emit a negative
DW_AT_data_member_location in some cases:

    $ cat test.cpp
    #include <memory>

    int
    main()
    {
      std::unique_ptr<int> ptr;
    }
    $ g++ -g test.cpp
    $ llvm-dwarfdump -F a.out
    ...
    0x00000964:       DW_TAG_member
                        DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp]   ("_M_head_impl")
                        DW_AT_decl_file [DW_FORM_data1]     ("/usr/include/c++/11.1.0/tuple")
                        DW_AT_decl_line [DW_FORM_data1]     (125)
                        DW_AT_decl_column [DW_FORM_data1]   (0x27)
                        DW_AT_type [DW_FORM_ref4]   (0x0000067a "default_delete<int>")
                        DW_AT_data_member_location [DW_FORM_sdata]  (-1)
    ...

This leads to a GDB crash (when built with ASan, otherwise probably
garbage results), since it tries to read just before (to the left, in
ASan speak) of the value's buffer:

    ==888645==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x6020000c52af at pc 0x7f711b239f4b bp 0x7fff356bd470 sp 0x7fff356bcc18
    READ of size 1 at 0x6020000c52af thread T0
        #0 0x7f711b239f4a in __interceptor_memcpy /build/gcc/src/gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:827
        #1 0x555c4977efa1 in value_contents_copy_raw /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/value.c:1347
        #2 0x555c497909cd in value_primitive_field(value*, long, int, type*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/value.c:3126
        #3 0x555c478f2eaa in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:333
        #4 0x555c478f63b2 in cp_print_value /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:513
        #5 0x555c478f02ca in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:161
        #6 0x555c478f63b2 in cp_print_value /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:513
        #7 0x555c478f02ca in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:161
        #8 0x555c478f63b2 in cp_print_value /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:513
        #9 0x555c478f02ca in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:161
        #10 0x555c4760d45f in c_value_print_struct /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:383
        #11 0x555c4760df4c in c_value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:438
        #12 0x555c483ff9a7 in language_defn::value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) const /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/language.c:632
        #13 0x555c49758b68 in do_val_print /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1048
        #14 0x555c49759b17 in common_val_print(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, language_defn const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1151
        #15 0x555c478f2fcb in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:335
        #16 0x555c478f63b2 in cp_print_value /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:513
        #17 0x555c478f02ca in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:161
        #18 0x555c4760d45f in c_value_print_struct /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:383
        #19 0x555c4760df4c in c_value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:438
        #20 0x555c483ff9a7 in language_defn::value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) const /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/language.c:632
        #21 0x555c49758b68 in do_val_print /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1048
        #22 0x555c49759b17 in common_val_print(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, language_defn const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1151
        #23 0x555c478f2fcb in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:335
        #24 0x555c4760d45f in c_value_print_struct /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:383
        #25 0x555c4760df4c in c_value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:438
        #26 0x555c483ff9a7 in language_defn::value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) const /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/language.c:632
        #27 0x555c49758b68 in do_val_print /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1048
        #28 0x555c49759b17 in common_val_print(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, language_defn const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1151
        #29 0x555c4760f04c in c_value_print(value*, ui_file*, value_print_options const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:587
        #30 0x555c483ff954 in language_defn::value_print(value*, ui_file*, value_print_options const*) const /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/language.c:614
        #31 0x555c49759f61 in value_print(value*, ui_file*, value_print_options const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1189
        #32 0x555c48950f70 in print_formatted /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/printcmd.c:337
        #33 0x555c48958eda in print_value(value*, value_print_options const&) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/printcmd.c:1258
        #34 0x555c48959891 in print_command_1 /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/printcmd.c:1367
        #35 0x555c4895a3df in print_command /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/printcmd.c:1458
        #36 0x555c4767f974 in do_simple_func /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:97
        #37 0x555c47692e25 in cmd_func(cmd_list_element*, char const*, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:2475
        #38 0x555c4936107e in execute_command(char const*, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/top.c:670
        #39 0x555c485f1bff in catch_command_errors /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:523
        #40 0x555c485f249c in execute_cmdargs /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:618
        #41 0x555c485f6677 in captured_main_1 /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:1317
        #42 0x555c485f6c83 in captured_main /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:1338
        #43 0x555c485f6d65 in gdb_main(captured_main_args*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:1363
        #44 0x555c46e41ba8 in main /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/gdb.c:32
        #45 0x7f71198bcb24 in __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x27b24)
        #46 0x555c46e4197d in _start (/home/simark/build/binutils-gdb-one-target/gdb/gdb+0x77f197d)

    0x6020000c52af is located 1 bytes to the left of 8-byte region [0x6020000c52b0,0x6020000c52b8)
    allocated by thread T0 here:
        #0 0x7f711b2b7459 in __interceptor_calloc /build/gcc/src/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154
        #1 0x555c470acdc9 in xcalloc /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/alloc.c:100
        #2 0x555c49b775cd in xzalloc(unsigned long) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/common-utils.cc:29
        #3 0x555c4977bdeb in allocate_value_contents /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/value.c:1029
        #4 0x555c4977be25 in allocate_value(type*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/value.c:1040
        #5 0x555c4979030d in value_primitive_field(value*, long, int, type*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/value.c:3092
        #6 0x555c478f6280 in cp_print_value /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:501
        #7 0x555c478f02ca in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:161
        #8 0x555c478f63b2 in cp_print_value /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:513
        #9 0x555c478f02ca in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:161
        #10 0x555c478f63b2 in cp_print_value /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:513
        #11 0x555c478f02ca in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:161
        #12 0x555c4760d45f in c_value_print_struct /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:383
        #13 0x555c4760df4c in c_value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:438
        #14 0x555c483ff9a7 in language_defn::value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) const /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/language.c:632
        #15 0x555c49758b68 in do_val_print /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1048
        #16 0x555c49759b17 in common_val_print(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, language_defn const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1151
        #17 0x555c478f2fcb in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:335
        #18 0x555c478f63b2 in cp_print_value /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:513
        #19 0x555c478f02ca in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:161
        #20 0x555c4760d45f in c_value_print_struct /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:383
        #21 0x555c4760df4c in c_value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:438
        #22 0x555c483ff9a7 in language_defn::value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) const /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/language.c:632
        #23 0x555c49758b68 in do_val_print /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1048
        #24 0x555c49759b17 in common_val_print(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, language_defn const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1151
        #25 0x555c478f2fcb in cp_print_value_fields(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*, type**, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/cp-valprint.c:335
        #26 0x555c4760d45f in c_value_print_struct /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:383
        #27 0x555c4760df4c in c_value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/c-valprint.c:438
        #28 0x555c483ff9a7 in language_defn::value_print_inner(value*, ui_file*, int, value_print_options const*) const /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/language.c:632
        #29 0x555c49758b68 in do_val_print /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/valprint.c:1048

Since there are some binaries with this in the wild, I think it would be
useful for GDB to work around this.  I did the obvious simple thing, if
the DW_AT_data_member_location's value is -1, replace it with 0.  I
added a producer check to only apply this fixup for GCC 11.  The idea is
that if some other compiler ever uses a DW_AT_data_member_location value
of -1 by mistake, we don't know (before analyzing the bug at least) if
they did mean 0 or some other value.  So I wouldn't want to apply the
fixup in that case.

Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28063
Change-Id: Ieef3459b0b9bbce8bdad838ba83b4b64e7269d42
lzshhxx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2022
Starting with commit

  commit 1da5d0e
  Date:   Tue Jan 4 08:02:24 2022 -0700

    Change how Python architecture and language are handled

we see a failure in gdb.threads/killed-outside.exp:

  ...
  Executing on target: kill -9 16622    (timeout = 300)
  builtin_spawn -ignore SIGHUP kill -9 16622
  continue
  Continuing.
  Couldn't get registers: No such process.
  (gdb) [Thread 0x7ffff77c2700 (LWP 16626) exited]

  Program terminated with signal SIGKILL, Killed.
  The program no longer exists.
  FAIL: gdb.threads/killed-outside.exp: prompt after first continue (timeout)

This is not a regression but a failure due to a change in GDB's
output.  Prior to the aforementioned commit, GDB has been printing the
"Couldn't get registers: No such process." message twice.  The second
one came from

  (top-gdb) bt
  #0  amd64_linux_nat_target::fetch_registers (this=0x555557f31440 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>, regcache=0x555558805ce0, regnum=16) at /gdb-up/gdb/amd64-linux-nat.c:225
  #1  0x000055555640ac5f in target_ops::fetch_registers (this=0x555557d636d0 <the_thread_db_target>, arg0=0x555558805ce0, arg1=16) at /gdb-up/gdb/target-delegates.c:502
  #2  0x000055555641a647 in target_fetch_registers (regcache=0x555558805ce0, regno=16) at /gdb-up/gdb/target.c:3945
  #3  0x0000555556278e68 in regcache::raw_update (this=0x555558805ce0, regnum=16) at /gdb-up/gdb/regcache.c:587
  #4  0x0000555556278f14 in readable_regcache::raw_read (this=0x555558805ce0, regnum=16, buf=0x555558881950 "") at /gdb-up/gdb/regcache.c:601
  #5  0x00005555562792aa in readable_regcache::cooked_read (this=0x555558805ce0, regnum=16, buf=0x555558881950 "") at /gdb-up/gdb/regcache.c:690
  #6  0x000055555627965e in readable_regcache::cooked_read_value (this=0x555558805ce0, regnum=16) at /gdb-up/gdb/regcache.c:748
  #7  0x0000555556352a37 in sentinel_frame_prev_register (this_frame=0x555558181090, this_prologue_cache=0x5555581810a8, regnum=16) at /gdb-up/gdb/sentinel-frame.c:53
  #8  0x0000555555fa4773 in frame_unwind_register_value (next_frame=0x555558181090, regnum=16) at /gdb-up/gdb/frame.c:1235
  #9  0x0000555555fa420d in frame_register_unwind (next_frame=0x555558181090, regnum=16, optimizedp=0x7fffffffd570, unavailablep=0x7fffffffd574, lvalp=0x7fffffffd57c, addrp=0x7fffffffd580,
      realnump=0x7fffffffd578, bufferp=0x7fffffffd5b0 "") at /gdb-up/gdb/frame.c:1143
  #10 0x0000555555fa455f in frame_unwind_register (next_frame=0x555558181090, regnum=16, buf=0x7fffffffd5b0 "") at /gdb-up/gdb/frame.c:1199
  #11 0x00005555560178e2 in i386_unwind_pc (gdbarch=0x5555587c4a70, next_frame=0x555558181090) at /gdb-up/gdb/i386-tdep.c:1972
  #12 0x0000555555cd2b9d in gdbarch_unwind_pc (gdbarch=0x5555587c4a70, next_frame=0x555558181090) at /gdb-up/gdb/gdbarch.c:3007
  #13 0x0000555555fa3a5b in frame_unwind_pc (this_frame=0x555558181090) at /gdb-up/gdb/frame.c:948
  #14 0x0000555555fa7621 in get_frame_pc (frame=0x555558181160) at /gdb-up/gdb/frame.c:2572
  #15 0x0000555555fa7706 in get_frame_address_in_block (this_frame=0x555558181160) at /gdb-up/gdb/frame.c:2602
  #16 0x0000555555fa77d0 in get_frame_address_in_block_if_available (this_frame=0x555558181160, pc=0x7fffffffd708) at /gdb-up/gdb/frame.c:2665
  #17 0x0000555555fa5f8d in select_frame (fi=0x555558181160) at /gdb-up/gdb/frame.c:1890
  #18 0x0000555555fa5bab in lookup_selected_frame (a_frame_id=..., frame_level=-1) at /gdb-up/gdb/frame.c:1720
  #19 0x0000555555fa5e47 in get_selected_frame (message=0x0) at /gdb-up/gdb/frame.c:1810
  #20 0x0000555555cc9c6e in get_current_arch () at /gdb-up/gdb/arch-utils.c:848
  #21 0x000055555625b239 in gdbpy_before_prompt_hook (extlang=0x555557451f20 <extension_language_python>, current_gdb_prompt=0x555557f4d890 <top_prompt+16> "(gdb) ")
      at /gdb-up/gdb/python/python.c:1063
  #22 0x0000555555f7cfbb in ext_lang_before_prompt (current_gdb_prompt=0x555557f4d890 <top_prompt+16> "(gdb) ") at /gdb-up/gdb/extension.c:922
  #23 0x0000555555f7d442 in std::_Function_handler<void (char const*), void (*)(char const*)>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&, char const*&&) (__functor=...,
      __args#0=@0x7fffffffd900: 0x555557f4d890 <top_prompt+16> "(gdb) ") at /usr/include/c++/7/bits/std_function.h:316
  #24 0x0000555555f752dd in std::function<void (char const*)>::operator()(char const*) const (this=0x55555817d838, __args#0=0x555557f4d890 <top_prompt+16> "(gdb) ")
      at /usr/include/c++/7/bits/std_function.h:706
  #25 0x0000555555f75100 in gdb::observers::observable<char const*>::notify (this=0x555557f49060 <gdb::observers::before_prompt>, args#0=0x555557f4d890 <top_prompt+16> "(gdb) ")
      at /gdb-up/gdb/../gdbsupport/observable.h:150
  #26 0x0000555555f736dc in top_level_prompt () at /gdb-up/gdb/event-top.c:444
  #27 0x0000555555f735ba in display_gdb_prompt (new_prompt=0x0) at /gdb-up/gdb/event-top.c:411
  #28 0x00005555564611a7 in tui_on_command_error () at /gdb-up/gdb/tui/tui-interp.c:205
  #29 0x0000555555c2173f in std::_Function_handler<void (), void (*)()>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&) (__functor=...) at /usr/include/c++/7/bits/std_function.h:316
  #30 0x0000555555e10c20 in std::function<void ()>::operator()() const (this=0x5555580f9028) at /usr/include/c++/7/bits/std_function.h:706
  #31 0x0000555555e10973 in gdb::observers::observable<>::notify() const (this=0x555557f48d20 <gdb::observers::command_error>) at /gdb-up/gdb/../gdbsupport/observable.h:150
  #32 0x00005555560e9b3f in start_event_loop () at /gdb-up/gdb/main.c:438
  #33 0x00005555560e9bcc in captured_command_loop () at /gdb-up/gdb/main.c:481
  #34 0x00005555560eb616 in captured_main (data=0x7fffffffddd0) at /gdb-up/gdb/main.c:1348
  #35 0x00005555560eb67c in gdb_main (args=0x7fffffffddd0) at /gdb-up/gdb/main.c:1363
  #36 0x0000555555c1b6b3 in main (argc=12, argv=0x7fffffffded8) at /gdb-up/gdb/gdb.c:32

Commit 1da5d0e eliminated the call to 'get_current_arch'
in 'gdbpy_before_prompt_hook'.  Hence, the second instance of
"Couldn't get registers: No such process." does not appear anymore.

Fix the failure by updating the regular expression in the test.
lzshhxx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2022
…ync."

Commit 14b3360 ("do_target_wait_1: Clear
TARGET_WNOHANG if the target isn't async.") broke some multi-target
tests, such as gdb.multi/multi-target-info-inferiors.exp.  The symptom
is that execution just hangs at some point.  What happens is:

1. One remote inferior is started, and now sits stopped at a breakpoint.
   It is not "async" at this point (but it "can async").

2. We run a native inferior, the event loop gets woken up by the native
   target's fd.

3. In do_target_wait, we randomly choose an inferior to call target_wait
   on first, it happens to be the remote inferior.

4. Because the target is currently not "async", we clear
   TARGET_WNOHANG, resulting in synchronous wait.  We therefore block
   here:

  #0  0x00007fe9540dbb4d in select () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
  #1  0x000055fc7e821da7 in gdb_select (n=15, readfds=0x7ffdb77c1fb0, writefds=0x0, exceptfds=0x7ffdb77c2050, timeout=0x7ffdb77c1f90) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/posix-hdep.c:31
  #2  0x000055fc7ddef905 in interruptible_select (n=15, readfds=0x7ffdb77c1fb0, writefds=0x0, exceptfds=0x7ffdb77c2050, timeout=0x7ffdb77c1f90) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/event-top.c:1134
  #3  0x000055fc7eda58e4 in ser_base_wait_for (scb=0x6250002e4100, timeout=1) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/ser-base.c:240
  #4  0x000055fc7eda66ba in do_ser_base_readchar (scb=0x6250002e4100, timeout=-1) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/ser-base.c:365
  #5  0x000055fc7eda6ff6 in generic_readchar (scb=0x6250002e4100, timeout=-1, do_readchar=0x55fc7eda663c <do_ser_base_readchar(serial*, int)>) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/ser-base.c:444
  #6  0x000055fc7eda718a in ser_base_readchar (scb=0x6250002e4100, timeout=-1) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/ser-base.c:471
  #7  0x000055fc7edb1ecd in serial_readchar (scb=0x6250002e4100, timeout=-1) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/serial.c:393
  #8  0x000055fc7ec48b8f in remote_target::readchar (this=0x617000038780, timeout=-1) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/remote.c:9446
  #9  0x000055fc7ec4da82 in remote_target::getpkt_or_notif_sane_1 (this=0x617000038780, buf=0x6170000387a8, forever=1, expecting_notif=1, is_notif=0x7ffdb77c24f0) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/remote.c:9928
  #10 0x000055fc7ec4f045 in remote_target::getpkt_or_notif_sane (this=0x617000038780, buf=0x6170000387a8, forever=1, is_notif=0x7ffdb77c24f0) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/remote.c:10037
  #11 0x000055fc7ec354d4 in remote_target::wait_ns (this=0x617000038780, ptid=..., status=0x7ffdb77c33c8, options=...) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/remote.c:8147
  #12 0x000055fc7ec38aa1 in remote_target::wait (this=0x617000038780, ptid=..., status=0x7ffdb77c33c8, options=...) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/remote.c:8337
  #13 0x000055fc7f1409ce in target_wait (ptid=..., status=0x7ffdb77c33c8, options=...) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:2612
  #14 0x000055fc7e19da98 in do_target_wait_1 (inf=0x617000038080, ptid=..., status=0x7ffdb77c33c8, options=...) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/infrun.c:3636
  #15 0x000055fc7e19e26b in operator() (__closure=0x7ffdb77c2f90, inf=0x617000038080) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/infrun.c:3697
  #16 0x000055fc7e19f0c4 in do_target_wait (ecs=0x7ffdb77c33a0, options=...) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/infrun.c:3716
  #17 0x000055fc7e1a31f7 in fetch_inferior_event () at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/infrun.c:4061

Before the aforementioned commit, we would not have cleared
TARGET_WNOHANG, the remote target's wait would have returned nothing,
and we would have consumed the native target's event.

After applying this revert, the testsuite state looks as good as before
for me on Ubuntu 20.04 amd64.

Change-Id: Ic17a1642935cabcc16c25cb6899d52e12c2f5c3f
lzshhxx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
While working on a different patch, I triggered an assertion from the
initialize_current_architecture code, specifically from one of
the *_gdbarch_init functions in a *-tdep.c file.  This exposes a
couple of issues with GDB.

This is easy enough to reproduce by adding 'gdb_assert (false)' into a
suitable function.  For example, I added a line into i386_gdbarch_init
and can see the following issue.

I start GDB and immediately hit the assert, the output is as you'd
expect, except for the very last line:

  $ ./gdb/gdb --data-directory ./gdb/data-directory/
  ../../src.dev-1/gdb/i386-tdep.c:8455: internal-error: i386_gdbarch_init: Assertion `false' failed.
  A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
  further debugging may prove unreliable.
  ----- Backtrace -----
  ... snip ...
  ---------------------
  ../../src.dev-1/gdb/i386-tdep.c:8455: internal-error: i386_gdbarch_init: Assertion `false' failed.
  A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
  further debugging may prove unreliable.
  Quit this debugging session? (y or n) ../../src.dev-1/gdb/ser-event.c:212:16: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct serial'

Something goes wrong when we try to query the user.  Note, I
configured GDB with --enable-ubsan, I suspect that without this the
above "error" would actually just be a crash.

The backtrace from ser-event.c:212 looks like this:

  (gdb) bt 10
  #0  serial_event_clear (event=0x675c020) at ../../src/gdb/ser-event.c:212
  #1  0x0000000000769456 in invoke_async_signal_handlers () at ../../src/gdb/async-event.c:211
  #2  0x000000000295049b in gdb_do_one_event () at ../../src/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:194
  #3  0x0000000001f015f8 in gdb_readline_wrapper (
      prompt=0x67135c0 "../../src/gdb/i386-tdep.c:8455: internal-error: i386_gdbarch_init: Assertion `false' failed.\nA problem internal to GDB has been detected,\nfurther debugging may prove unreliable.\nQuit this debugg"...)
      at ../../src/gdb/top.c:1141
  #4  0x0000000002118b64 in defaulted_query(const char *, char, typedef __va_list_tag __va_list_tag *) (
      ctlstr=0x2e4eb68 "%s\nQuit this debugging session? ", defchar=0 '\000', args=0x7fffffffa6e0)
      at ../../src/gdb/utils.c:934
  #5  0x0000000002118f72 in query (ctlstr=0x2e4eb68 "%s\nQuit this debugging session? ")
      at ../../src/gdb/utils.c:1026
  #6  0x00000000021170f6 in internal_vproblem(internal_problem *, const char *, int, const char *, typedef __va_list_tag __va_list_tag *) (problem=0x6107bc0 <internal_error_problem>, file=0x2b976c8 "../../src/gdb/i386-tdep.c",
      line=8455, fmt=0x2b96d7f "%s: Assertion `%s' failed.", ap=0x7fffffffa8e8) at ../../src/gdb/utils.c:417
  #7  0x00000000021175a0 in internal_verror (file=0x2b976c8 "../../src/gdb/i386-tdep.c", line=8455,
      fmt=0x2b96d7f "%s: Assertion `%s' failed.", ap=0x7fffffffa8e8) at ../../src/gdb/utils.c:485
  #8  0x00000000029503b3 in internal_error (file=0x2b976c8 "../../src/gdb/i386-tdep.c", line=8455,
      fmt=0x2b96d7f "%s: Assertion `%s' failed.") at ../../src/gdbsupport/errors.cc:55
  #9  0x000000000122d5b6 in i386_gdbarch_init (info=..., arches=0x0) at ../../src/gdb/i386-tdep.c:8455
  (More stack frames follow...)

It turns out that the problem is that the async event handler
mechanism has been invoked, but this has not yet been initialized.

If we look at gdb_init (in gdb/top.c) we can indeed see the call to
gdb_init_signals is after the call to initialize_current_architecture.

If I reorder the calls, moving gdb_init_signals earlier, then the
initial error is resolved, however, things are still broken.  I now
see the same "Quit this debugging session? (y or n)" prompt, but when
I provide an answer and press return GDB immediately crashes.

So what's going on now?  The next problem is that the call_readline
field within the current_ui structure is not initialized, and this
callback is invoked to process the reply I entered.

The problem is that call_readline is setup as a result of calling
set_top_level_interpreter, which is called from captured_main_1.
Unfortunately, set_top_level_interpreter is called after gdb_init is
called.

I wondered how to solve this problem for a while, however, I don't
know if there's an easy "just reorder some lines" solution here.
Looking through captured_main_1 there seems to be a bunch of
dependencies between printing various things, parsing config files,
and setting up the interpreter.  I'm sure there is a solution hiding
in there somewhere.... I'm just not sure I want to spend any longer
looking for it.

So.

I propose a simpler solution, more of a hack/work-around.  In utils.c
we already have a function filtered_printing_initialized, this is
checked in a few places within internal_vproblem.  In some of these
cases the call gates whether or not GDB will query the user.

My proposal is to add a new readline_initialized function, which
checks if the current_ui has had readline initialized yet.  If this is
not the case then we should not attempt to query the user.

After this change GDB prints the error message, the backtrace, and
then aborts (including dumping core).  This actually seems pretty sane
as, if GDB has not yet made it through the initialization then it
doesn't make much sense to allow the user to say "no, I don't want to
quit the debug session" (I think).
lzshhxx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
The variable right_lib_flags is not being set correctly to define RIGHT.
The value RIGHT is needed to force the address of the library functions
lib1_func3 and lib2_func4 to occur at different address in the wrong and
right libraries.

With RIGHT defined correctly, functions lib1_func3 and lib2_func4 occur
at different addresses the test runs correctly on Powerpc.

The test needs the lib2 addresses to be different in the right and
wrong cases.  That is the point of introducing function lib2_spacer
with the ifdef RIGHT compiler directive.

On Intel, the ARRAY_SIZE of 1 versus 8192 is sufficient to get the
dynamic linker to move the addresses of the library.  You can also get
the same effect on PowerPC but you must use a value much larger than
8192.

The key thing is that the test was not properly setting RIGHT to
defined to get the lib2_spacer function on Intel and Powerpc.

Without the patch, we have the Intel backtrace for the bad libraries:

backtrace
#0  break_here () at /home/ ... /gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search.c:30
#1  0x00007ffff7fae156 in ?? ()
#2  0x00007fffffffc150 in ?? ()
#3  0x00007ffff7fbb156 in ?? ()
#4  0x00007fffffffc160 in ?? ()
#5  0x00007ffff7fae146 in ?? ()
#6  0x00007fffffffc170 in ?? ()
#7  0x00007ffff7fbb146 in ?? ()
#8  0x00007fffffffc180 in ?? ()
#9  0x0000555555555156 in main () at /home/ ... /binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search.c:23
Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/solib-search.exp: backtrace (with wrong libs) (data collection)

The backtrace on Intel with the good libraries is:

backtrace
#0  break_here () at /.../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search.c:30
#1  0x00007ffff7fae156 in lib2_func4 () at /.../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib2.c:49
#2  0x00007ffff7fbb156 in lib1_func3 () at /.../gdb.base/solib-search-lib1.c:49
#3  0x00007ffff7fae146 in lib2_func2 () at /.../testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib2.c:30
#4  0x00007ffff7fbb146 in lib1_func1 () at /.../gdb.base/solib-search-lib1.c:30
#5  0x0000555555555156 in main () at /...solib-search.c:23
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/solib-search.exp: backtrace (with right libs) (data collection)
PASS: gdb.base/solib-search.exp: backtrace (with right libs)

In one case the backtrace is correct and the other it
is wrong on Intel.  This is due to the fact that the ARRAY_SIZE caused
the dynamic linker to move the library function addresses around.  I
believe it has to do with the default size of the data and code
sections used by the dynamic linker.

So without the patch the backtrace on PowerPC looks like:

 backtrace
#0  break_here () at /.../solib-search.c:30
#1  0x00007ffff7f007f4 in lib2_func4 () at /.../solib-search-lib2.c:49
#2  0x00007ffff7f307f4 in lib1_func3 () at /.../solib-search-lib1.c:49
#3  0x00007ffff7f007ac in lib2_func2 () at /.../solib-search-lib2.c:30
#4  0x00007ffff7f307ac in lib1_func1 () at /.../solib-search-lib1.c:30
#5  0x000000001000074c in main () at /.../solib-search.c:23

for both the good and bad libraries.

The patch fixes defining RIGHT in solib-search-lib1.c and solib-search-
lib2.c.  Note, without the patch the lib1_spacer and lib2_spacer
functions do not show up in the object dump of the Intel or Powerpc
libraries as it should.  The patch fixes that by making sure RIGHT gets
defined.

Now with the patch the backtrace for the bad library on PowerPC looks
like:

backtrace
#0  break_here () at /.../solib-search.c:30
#1  0x00007ffff7f0083c in __glink_PLTresolve () from /.../solib-search-lib2.so
Backtrace stopped: frame did not save the PC

And the backtrace for the good libraries on PowerPC looks like:

backtrace
#0  break_here () at /.../solib-search.c:30
#1  0x00007ffff7f0083c in lib2_func4 () at /.../solib-search-lib2.c:49
#2  0x00007ffff7f3083c in lib1_func3 () at /.../solib-search-lib1.c:49
#3  0x00007ffff7f007cc in lib2_func2 () at /.../solib-search-lib2.c:30
#4  0x00007ffff7f307cc in lib1_func1 () at /.../solib-search-lib1.c:30
#5  0x000000001000074c in main () at /.../solib-search.c:23
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/solib-search.exp: backtrace (with right libs) (data collection)
PASS: gdb.base/solib-search.exp: backtrace (with right libs)

The issue then is on Power where the ARRAY_SIZE of 1 versus 8192 is not
sufficient to cause the dymanic linker to allocate the libraries at
different addresses.  I don't claim to understand the specifics of how
the dynamic linker works and what the default size is for the data and
code sections are.  My guess is by default PowerPC allocates a larger
data size by default, which is large enough to hold array[8192].  The
default size of the data section allocated by the dynamic linker on
Intel is not large enough to hold array[8192] thus causing the code
section on Intel to have to move when the large array is defined.

Note on PowerPC, if you make ARRAY_SIZE big enough, then you will cause
the library addresses to occur at different addresses as the larger
data section forces the code section to a different address.  That was
actually my original fix for the program until I spoke with Doug Evans
who originally wrote the test.  Doug noticed that RIGHT was not getting
defined as he originally intended in the test.

With the patch to fix the definition of RIGHT, PowerPC has a bad and a
good backtrace because the address of lib1_func3 and lib2_func4 both
move because lib1_spacer and lib2_spacer are now defined
before lib1_func3 and lib2_func4.

Without the patch, the lib1_spacer and lib2_spacer function doesn't show
up in the binary for the correct or incorrect library on Intel or PowerPC.
With the patch, RIGHT gets defined as originally intended for the test on
both architectures and lib1_spacer and lib2_spacer function show up in the
binaries on both architectures changing the other function addresses as
intended thus causing the test work as intended on PowerPC.
lzshhxx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
… failing to attach

Running

  $ ../gdbserver/gdbserver --once --attach :1234 539436

with ASan while /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope is set to 1 (prevents
attaching) shows that we fail to free some platform-specific objects
tied to the process_info (process_info_private and arch_process_info):

    Direct leak of 32 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
        #0 0x7f6b558b3fb9 in __interceptor_calloc /usr/src/debug/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154
        #1 0x562eaf15d04a in xcalloc /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdb/alloc.c:100
        #2 0x562eaf251548 in xcnew<process_info_private> /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdbsupport/poison.h:122
        #3 0x562eaf22810c in linux_process_target::add_linux_process_no_mem_file(int, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:426
        #4 0x562eaf22d33f in linux_process_target::attach(unsigned long) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:1132
        #5 0x562eaf1a7222 in attach_inferior /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:308
        #6 0x562eaf1c1016 in captured_main /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3949
        #7 0x562eaf1c1d60 in main /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4084
        #8 0x7f6b552f630f in __libc_start_call_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2d30f)

    Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
        #0 0x7f6b558b3fb9 in __interceptor_calloc /usr/src/debug/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154
        #1 0x562eaf15d04a in xcalloc /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdb/alloc.c:100
        #2 0x562eaf2a0d79 in xcnew<arch_process_info> /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdbsupport/poison.h:122
        #3 0x562eaf295e2c in x86_target::low_new_process() /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-x86-low.cc:723
        #4 0x562eaf22819b in linux_process_target::add_linux_process_no_mem_file(int, int) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:428
        #5 0x562eaf22d33f in linux_process_target::attach(unsigned long) /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:1132
        #6 0x562eaf1a7222 in attach_inferior /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:308
        #7 0x562eaf1c1016 in captured_main /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3949
        #8 0x562eaf1c1d60 in main /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4084
        #9 0x7f6b552f630f in __libc_start_call_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2d30f)

Those objects are deleted by linux_process_target::mourn, but that is
not called if we fail to attach, we only call remove_process.  I
initially fixed this by making linux_process_target::attach call
linux_process_target::mourn on failure (before calling error).  But this
isn't done anywhere else (including in GDB) so it would just be
confusing to do things differently here.

Instead, add a linux_process_target::remove_linux_process helper method
(which calls remove_process), and call that instead of remove_process in
the Linux target.  Move the free-ing of the extra data from the mourn
method to that new method.

Change-Id: I277059a69d5f08087a7f3ef0b8f1792a1fcf7a85
lzshhxx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
Commit 152a174 ("gdb: prune inferiors at end of
fetch_inferior_event, fix intermittent failure of
gdb.threads/fork-plus-threads.exp") broke some tests with the
native-gdbserver board, such as:

    (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: detach-on-fork=off: follow-fork=child: break cond on target : vfork: break marker
    continue^M
    Continuing.^M
    terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gdb_exception_error'^M

I can manually reproduce the issue by running (just the commands that
the test does as a one liner):

    $ ./gdb -q --data-directory=data-directory \
          testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/step-over-syscall/step-over-vfork \
	  -ex "tar rem | ../gdbserver/gdbserver - testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/step-over-syscall/step-over-vfork" \
	  -ex "b main" \
	  -ex c \
	  -ex "d 1" \
	  -ex "set displaced-stepping off" \
	  -ex "b *0x7ffff7d7ac5a if main == 0" \
	  -ex "set detach-on-fork off" \
	  -ex "set follow-fork-mode child" \
	  -ex c \
	  -ex "inferior 1" \
	  -ex "b marker" \
	  -ex c

... where 0x7ffff7d7ac5a is the exact address of the vfork syscall
(which can be found by looking at gdb.log).

The important part of the above is that a vfork syscall creates inferior
2, then inferior 2 executes until exit, then we switch back to inferior
1 and try to resume it.

The uncaught exception happens here:

    #4  0x00005596969d81a9 in error (fmt=0x559692da9e40 "Cannot execute this command while the target is running.\nUse the \"interrupt\" command to stop the target\nand then try again.")
        at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/errors.cc:43
    #5  0x0000559695af6f66 in remote_target::putpkt_binary (this=0x617000038080, buf=0x559692da4380 "qSymbol::", cnt=9) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/remote.c:9560
    #6  0x0000559695af6aaf in remote_target::putpkt (this=0x617000038080, buf=0x559692da4380 "qSymbol::") at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/remote.c:9518
    #7  0x0000559695ab50dc in remote_target::remote_check_symbols (this=0x617000038080) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/remote.c:5141
    #8  0x0000559695b3cccf in remote_new_objfile (objfile=0x0) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/remote.c:14600
    #9  0x0000559693bc52a9 in std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*&)(objfile*), objfile*> (__f=@0x61b0000167f8: 0x559695b3cb1d <remote_new_objfile(objfile*)>) at /usr/include/c++/11.2.0/bits/invoke.h:61
    #10 0x0000559693bb2848 in std::__invoke_r<void, void (*&)(objfile*), objfile*> (__fn=@0x61b0000167f8: 0x559695b3cb1d <remote_new_objfile(objfile*)>) at /usr/include/c++/11.2.0/bits/invoke.h:111
    #11 0x0000559693b8dddf in std::_Function_handler<void (objfile*), void (*)(objfile*)>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&, objfile*&&) (__functor=..., __args#0=@0x7ffe0bae0590: 0x0) at /usr/include/c++/11.2.0/bits/std_function.h:291
    #12 0x00005596956374b2 in std::function<void (objfile*)>::operator()(objfile*) const (this=0x61b0000167f8, __args#0=0x0) at /usr/include/c++/11.2.0/bits/std_function.h:560
    #13 0x0000559695633c64 in gdb::observers::observable<objfile*>::notify (this=0x55969ef5c480 <gdb::observers::new_objfile>, args#0=0x0) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/observable.h:150
    #14 0x0000559695df6cc2 in clear_symtab_users (add_flags=...) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/symfile.c:2873
    #15 0x000055969574c263 in program_space::~program_space (this=0x6120000c8a40, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/progspace.c:154
    #16 0x0000559694fc086b in delete_inferior (inf=0x61700003bf80) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/inferior.c:205
    #17 0x0000559694fc341f in prune_inferiors () at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/inferior.c:390
    #18 0x0000559695017ada in fetch_inferior_event () at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/infrun.c:4293
    #19 0x0000559694f629e6 in inferior_event_handler (event_type=INF_REG_EVENT) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/inf-loop.c:41
    #20 0x0000559695b3b0e3 in remote_async_serial_handler (scb=0x6250001ef100, context=0x6170000380a8) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/remote.c:14466
    #21 0x0000559695c59eb7 in run_async_handler_and_reschedule (scb=0x6250001ef100) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/ser-base.c:138
    #22 0x0000559695c5a42a in fd_event (error=0, context=0x6250001ef100) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/ser-base.c:189
    #23 0x00005596969d9ebf in handle_file_event (file_ptr=0x60700005af40, ready_mask=1) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:574
    #24 0x00005596969da7fa in gdb_wait_for_event (block=0) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:700
    #25 0x00005596969d8539 in gdb_do_one_event () at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:212

If I enable "set debug infrun" just before the last continue, we see:

    (gdb) continue
    Continuing.
    [infrun] clear_proceed_status_thread: 965604.965604.0
    [infrun] proceed: enter
      [infrun] proceed: addr=0xffffffffffffffff, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_DEFAULT
      [infrun] scoped_disable_commit_resumed: reason=proceeding
      [infrun] start_step_over: enter
        [infrun] start_step_over: stealing global queue of threads to step, length = 0
        [infrun] operator(): step-over queue now empty
      [infrun] start_step_over: exit
      [infrun] resume_1: step=0, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_0, trap_expected=0, current thread [965604.965604.0] at 0x7ffff7d7ac5c
      [infrun] do_target_resume: resume_ptid=965604.0.0, step=0, sig=GDB_SIGNAL_0
      [infrun] prepare_to_wait: prepare_to_wait
      [infrun] reset: reason=proceeding
      [infrun] maybe_set_commit_resumed_all_targets: enabling commit-resumed for target remote
      [infrun] maybe_call_commit_resumed_all_targets: calling commit_resumed for target remote
    [infrun] proceed: exit
    [infrun] fetch_inferior_event: enter
      [infrun] scoped_disable_commit_resumed: reason=handling event
      [infrun] do_target_wait: Found 2 inferiors, starting at #1
      [infrun] random_pending_event_thread: None found.
      [infrun] print_target_wait_results: target_wait (-1.0.0 [process -1], status) =
      [infrun] print_target_wait_results:   965604.965604.0 [Thread 965604.965604],
      [infrun] print_target_wait_results:   status->kind = VFORK_DONE
      [infrun] handle_inferior_event: status->kind = VFORK_DONE
      [infrun] context_switch: Switching context from 0.0.0 to 965604.965604.0
      [infrun] handle_vfork_done: not waiting for a vfork-done event
      [infrun] start_step_over: enter
        [infrun] start_step_over: stealing global queue of threads to step, length = 0
        [infrun] operator(): step-over queue now empty
      [infrun] start_step_over: exit
      [infrun] resume_1: step=0, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_0, trap_expected=0, current thread [965604.965604.0] at 0x7ffff7d7ac5c
      [infrun] do_target_resume: resume_ptid=965604.0.0, step=0, sig=GDB_SIGNAL_0
      [infrun] prepare_to_wait: prepare_to_wait
      [infrun] reset: reason=handling event
      [infrun] maybe_set_commit_resumed_all_targets: enabling commit-resumed for target remote
      [infrun] maybe_call_commit_resumed_all_targets: calling commit_resumed for target remote
    terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gdb_exception_error'

What happens is:

 - After doing the "continue" on inferior 1, the remote target gives us
   a VFORK_DONE event.  The core ignores it and resumes inferior 1.
 - Since prune_inferiors is now called after each handled event, in
   fetch_inferior_event, it is called after we handled that VFORK_DONE
   event and resumed inferior 1.
 - Inferior 2 is pruned, which (see backtrace above) causes its program
   space to be deleted, which clears the symtabs for that program space,
   which calls the new_objfile observable and remote_new_objfile
   observer (with a nullptr objfile, to indicate that the previously
   loaded symbols have been discarded), which calls
   remote_check_symbols.

remote_check_symbols is the function that sends the qSymbol packet, to
let the remote side ask for symbol addresses.  The problem is that the
remote target is working in all-stop / sync mode and is currently
resumed.  It has sent a vCont packet to resume the target and is waiting
for a stop reply.  It can't send any packets in the mean time.  That
causes the exception to be thrown.

This wasn't a problem before, when prune_inferiors was called in
normal_stop, because it was always called at a time the target was not
resumed.

An important observation here is that the new_objfile observable is
invoked for a change in inferior 2's program space (inferior 2's program
space is the current program space).  Inferior 2 isn't bound to any
process on the remote side (it has exited, that's why it's being
pruned).  It doesn't make sense to try to send a qSymbol packet for a
process that doesn't exist on the remote side.  remote_check_symbols
actually attempts to avoid that:

   /* The remote side has no concept of inferiors that aren't running
     yet, it only knows about running processes.  If we're connected
     but our current inferior is not running, we should not invite the
     remote target to request symbol lookups related to its
     (unrelated) current process.  */
  if (!target_has_execution ())
    return;

The problem here is that while inferior 2's program space is the current
program space, inferior 1 is the current inferior.  So the check above
passes, since inferior has execution.  We therefore try to send a
qSymbol packet for inferior 1 in reaction to a change in inferior 2's
program space, that's wrong.

This exposes a conceptual flaw in remote_new_objfile.  The "new_objfile"
event concerns a specific program space, which can concern multiple
inferiors, as inferiors can share a program space.  We shouldn't
consider the current inferior at all, but instead all inferiors bound to
the affected program space.  Especially since the current inferior can
be unrelated to the current program space at that point.

To be clear, we are in this state because ~program_space sets itself as
the current program space, but there is no more inferior having that
program space to switch to, inferior 2 has already been unlinked.

To fix this, make remote_new_objfile iterate on all inferiors bound to
the affected program space.  Remove the target_has_execution check from
remote_check_symbols, replace it with an assert.  All callers must
ensure that the current inferior has execution before calling it.

Change-Id: Ica643145bcc03115248290fd310cadab8ec8371c
lzshhxx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
Luis noticed that the recent changes to gdbserver to make it track
process and threads independently regressed a few gdb.multi/*.exp
tests for aarch64-linux.

We started seeing the following internal error for
gdb.multi/multi-target-continue.exp for example:

 Starting program: binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.multi/multi-target-continue/multi-target-continue ^M
 Error in re-setting breakpoint 2: Remote connection closed^M
 ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/thread.c:85: internal-error: inferior_thread: Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed.^M
 A problem internal to GDB has been detected,^M
 further debugging may prove unreliable.

A backtrace looks like:

 #0  thread_regcache_data (thread=thread@entry=0x0) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.cc:120
 #1  0x0000aaaaaaabf0e8 in get_thread_regcache (thread=0x0, fetch=fetch@entry=0) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/regcache.cc:31
 #2  0x0000aaaaaaad785c in is_64bit_tdesc () at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-aarch64-low.cc:194
 #3  0x0000aaaaaaad8a48 in aarch64_target::sw_breakpoint_from_kind (this=<optimized out>, kind=4, size=0xffffffffef04) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-aarch64-low.cc:3226
 #4  0x0000aaaaaaabe220 in bp_size (bp=0xaaaaaab6f3d0) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.cc:226
 #5  check_mem_read (mem_addr=187649984471104, buf=buf@entry=0xaaaaaab625d0 "\006", mem_len=mem_len@entry=56) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/mem-break.cc:1862
 #6  0x0000aaaaaaacc660 in read_inferior_memory (memaddr=<optimized out>, myaddr=0xaaaaaab625d0 "\006", len=56) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/target.cc:93
 #7  0x0000aaaaaaac3d9c in gdb_read_memory (len=56, myaddr=0xaaaaaab625d0 "\006", memaddr=187649984471104) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1071
 #8  gdb_read_memory (memaddr=187649984471104, myaddr=0xaaaaaab625d0 "\006", len=56) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1048
 #9  0x0000aaaaaaac82a4 in process_serial_event () at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4307
 #10 handle_serial_event (err=<optimized out>, client_data=<optimized out>) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4520
 #11 0x0000aaaaaaafbcd0 in gdb_wait_for_event (block=block@entry=1) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:700
 #12 0x0000aaaaaaafc0b0 in gdb_wait_for_event (block=1) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:596
 #13 gdb_do_one_event () at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:237
 #14 0x0000aaaaaaacacb0 in start_event_loop () at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3518
 #15 captured_main (argc=4, argv=<optimized out>) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3998
 #16 0x0000aaaaaaab66dc in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4084

This sequence of functions is invoked due to a series of conditions:

 1 - The probe-based breakpoint mechanism failed (for some reason) so ...

 2 - ... gdbserver has to know what type of architecture it is dealing
     with so it can pick the right breakpoint kind, so it wants to
     check if we have a 64-bit target.

 3 - To determine the size of a register, we currently fetch the
     current thread's register cache, and the current thread pointer
     is now nullptr.

In #3, the current thread is nullptr because gdb_read_memory clears it
on purpose, via set_desired_process, exactly to expose code relying on
the current thread when it shouldn't.  It was always possible to end
up in this situation (when the current thread exits), but it was
harder to reproduce before.

This commit fixes it by tweaking is_64bit_tdesc to look at the current
process's tdesc instead of the current thread's tdesc.

Note that the thread's tdesc is itself filled from the process's
tdesc, so this should be equivalent:

 struct regcache *
 get_thread_regcache (struct thread_info *thread, int fetch)
 {
   struct regcache *regcache;

   regcache = thread_regcache_data (thread);

 ...
   if (regcache == NULL)
     {
       struct process_info *proc = get_thread_process (thread);

       gdb_assert (proc->tdesc != NULL);

       regcache = new_register_cache (proc->tdesc);
       set_thread_regcache_data (thread, regcache);
     }
 ...

Change-Id: Ibc809d7345e70a2f058b522bdc5cdbdca97e2cdc
lzshhxx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2022
Simon reported that the recent change to make GDB and GDBserver avoid
reading shell registers caused a GDBserver regression, caught with
ASan while running gdb.server/non-existing-program.exp:

 $ /home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/../gdbserver/gdbserver stdio non-existing-program
 =================================================================
 ==127719==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x60f0000000e9 at pc 0x55bcbfa301f4 bp 0x7ffd238a7320 sp 0x7ffd238a7310
 WRITE of size 1 at 0x60f0000000e9 thread T0
     #0 0x55bcbfa301f3 in scoped_restore_tmpl<bool>::~scoped_restore_tmpl() /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdbsupport/scoped_restore.h:86
     #1 0x55bcbfa2ffe9 in post_fork_inferior(int, char const*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/fork-child.cc:120
     #2 0x55bcbf9c9199 in linux_process_target::create_inferior(char const*, std::__debug::vector<char*, std::allocator<char*> > const&) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:991
     #3 0x55bcbf954549 in captured_main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3941
     #4 0x55bcbf9552f0 in main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4084
     #5 0x7ff9d663b0b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x240b2)
     #6 0x55bcbf8ef2bd in _start (/home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/gdbserver+0x1352bd)

 0x60f0000000e9 is located 169 bytes inside of 176-byte region [0x60f000000040,0x60f0000000f0)
 freed by thread T0 here:
     #0 0x7ff9d6c6f0c7 in operator delete(void*) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:160
     #1 0x55bcbf910d00 in remove_process(process_info*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.cc:164
     #2 0x55bcbf9c4ac7 in linux_process_target::remove_linux_process(process_info*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:454
     #3 0x55bcbf9cdaa6 in linux_process_target::mourn(process_info*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:1599
     #4 0x55bcbf988dc4 in target_mourn_inferior(ptid_t) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/target.cc:205
     #5 0x55bcbfa32020 in startup_inferior(process_stratum_target*, int, int, target_waitstatus*, ptid_t*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdb/nat/fork-inferior.c:515
     #6 0x55bcbfa2fdeb in post_fork_inferior(int, char const*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/fork-child.cc:111
     #7 0x55bcbf9c9199 in linux_process_target::create_inferior(char const*, std::__debug::vector<char*, std::allocator<char*> > const&) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:991
     #8 0x55bcbf954549 in captured_main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3941
     #9 0x55bcbf9552f0 in main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4084
     #10 0x7ff9d663b0b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x240b2)

 previously allocated by thread T0 here:
     #0 0x7ff9d6c6e5a7 in operator new(unsigned long) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:99
     #1 0x55bcbf910ad0 in add_process(int, int) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.cc:144
     #2 0x55bcbf9c477d in linux_process_target::add_linux_process_no_mem_file(int, int) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:425
     #3 0x55bcbf9c8f4c in linux_process_target::create_inferior(char const*, std::__debug::vector<char*, std::allocator<char*> > const&) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:985
     #4 0x55bcbf954549 in captured_main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3941
     #5 0x55bcbf9552f0 in main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4084
     #6 0x7ff9d663b0b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x240b2)

Above we see that in the non-existing-program case, the process gets
deleted before the starting_up flag gets restored to false.

This happens because startup_inferior calls target_mourn_inferior
before throwing an error, and in GDBserver, unlike in GDB, mourning
deletes the process.

Fix this by not using a scoped_restore to manage the starting_up flag,
since we should only clear it when startup_inferior doesn't throw.

Change-Id: I67325d6f81c64de4e89e20e4ec4556f57eac7f6c
lzshhxx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2022
When building gdb with -fsanitize=thread and gcc 12, and running test-case
gdb.dwarf2/dwz.exp, we run into a data race between thread T2 and the main
thread in the same write:
...
Write of size 1 at 0x7b200000300c:^M
    #0 cutu_reader::cutu_reader(dwarf2_per_cu_data*, dwarf2_per_objfile*, \
    abbrev_table*, dwarf2_cu*, bool, abbrev_cache*) gdb/dwarf2/read.c:6252 \
    (gdb+0x82f3b3)^M
...
which is here:
...
         this_cu->dwarf_version = cu->header.version;
...

Both writes are called from the parallel for in dwarf2_build_psymtabs_hard,
this one directly:
...
    #1 process_psymtab_comp_unit gdb/dwarf2/read.c:6774 (gdb+0x8304d7)^M
    #2 operator() gdb/dwarf2/read.c:7098 (gdb+0x8317be)^M
    #3 operator() gdbsupport/parallel-for.h:163 (gdb+0x872380)^M
...
and this via the PU import:
...
    #1 cooked_indexer::ensure_cu_exists(cutu_reader*, dwarf2_per_objfile*, \
    sect_offset, bool,  bool) gdb/dwarf2/read.c:17964 (gdb+0x85c43b)^M
    #2 cooked_indexer::index_imported_unit(cutu_reader*, unsigned char const*, \
    abbrev_info const*) gdb/dwarf2/read.c:18248 (gdb+0x85d8ff)^M
    #3 cooked_indexer::index_dies(cutu_reader*, unsigned char const*, \
    cooked_index_entry const*, bool) gdb/dwarf2/read.c:18302 (gdb+0x85dcdb)^M
    #4 cooked_indexer::make_index(cutu_reader*) gdb/dwarf2/read.c:18443 \
    (gdb+0x85e68a)^M
    #5 process_psymtab_comp_unit gdb/dwarf2/read.c:6812 (gdb+0x830879)^M
    #6 operator() gdb/dwarf2/read.c:7098 (gdb+0x8317be)^M
    #7 operator() gdbsupport/parallel-for.h:171 (gdb+0x8723e2)^M
...

Fix this by setting the field earlier, in read_comp_units_from_section.

The write in cutu_reader::cutu_reader() is still needed, in case
read_comp_units_from_section is not used (run the test-case with say, target
board cc-with-gdb-index).

Make the write conditional, such that it doesn't trigger if the field is
already set by read_comp_units_from_section.  Instead, verify that the
field already has the value that we're trying to set it to.

Move this logic into into a member function set_version (in analogy to the
already present member function version) to make sure it's used consistenly,
and make the field private in order to enforce access through the member
functions, and rename it to m_dwarf_version.

While we're at it, make sure that the version is set before read, to avoid
say returning true for "per_cu.version () < 5" if "per_cu.version () == 0".

Tested on x86_64-linux.
jiegec pushed a commit to jiegec/binutils-gdb that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2023
After running a number of programs under Windows gdb and detaching
them, I typed run in gdb, and got a hang, here:

 (top-gdb) bt
 #0  sharing_input_terminal (pid=4672) at /home/pedro/gdb/src/gdb/mingw-hdep.c:388
 loongson#1  0x00007ff71a2d8678 in sharing_input_terminal (inf=0x23bf23dafb0) at /home/pedro/gdb/src/gdb/inflow.c:269
 loongson#2  0x00007ff71a2d887b in child_terminal_save_inferior (self=0x23bf23de060) at /home/pedro/gdb/src/gdb/inflow.c:423
 loongson#3  0x00007ff71a2c80c0 in inf_child_target::terminal_save_inferior (this=0x23bf23de060) at /home/pedro/gdb/src/gdb/inf-child.c:111
 loongson#4  0x00007ff71a429c0f in target_terminal_is_ours_kind (desired_state=target_terminal_state::is_ours_for_output) at /home/pedro/gdb/src/gdb/target.c:1037
 loongson#5  0x00007ff71a429e02 in target_terminal::ours_for_output () at /home/pedro/gdb/src/gdb/target.c:1094
 loongson#6  0x00007ff71a2ccc8e in post_create_inferior (from_tty=0) at /home/pedro/gdb/src/gdb/infcmd.c:245
 loongson#7  0x00007ff71a2cd431 in run_command_1 (args=0x0, from_tty=0, run_how=RUN_NORMAL) at /home/pedro/gdb/src/gdb/infcmd.c:502
 loongson#8  0x00007ff71a2cd58b in run_command (args=0x0, from_tty=0) at /home/pedro/gdb/src/gdb/infcmd.c:527

The problem is that the loop around GetConsoleProcessList looped
forever, because there were exactly 10 processes to return.
GetConsoleProcessList's documentation says:

  If the buffer is too small to hold all the valid process identifiers,
  the return value is the required number of array elements. The
  function will have stored no identifiers in the buffer. In this
  situation, use the return value to allocate a buffer that is large
  enough to store the entire list and call the function again.

In this case, the buffer wasn't too small, it was exactly the right
size, so we should have broken out of the loop.  We didn't due to a
"<" check that should have been "<=".  That is fixed by this patch.

Approved-By: Tom Tromey <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]>
Change-Id: I14e4909f2ac2fa83d0d9b6e64418b5831ac4e4e3
jiegec pushed a commit to jiegec/binutils-gdb that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2023
This commit fixes an issue that was discovered while writing the tests
for the previous commit.

I noticed that, when GDB restarts an inferior, the executable_changed
event would trigger twice.  The first notification would originate
from:

  #0  exec_file_attach (filename=0x4046680 "/tmp/hello.x", from_tty=0) at ../../src/gdb/exec.c:513
  loongson#1  0x00000000006f3adb in reopen_exec_file () at ../../src/gdb/corefile.c:122
  loongson#2  0x0000000000e6a3f2 in generic_mourn_inferior () at ../../src/gdb/target.c:3682
  loongson#3  0x0000000000995121 in inf_child_target::mourn_inferior (this=0x2fe95c0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>) at ../../src/gdb/inf-child.c:192
  loongson#4  0x0000000000995cff in inf_ptrace_target::mourn_inferior (this=0x2fe95c0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>) at ../../src/gdb/inf-ptrace.c:125
  loongson#5  0x0000000000a32472 in linux_nat_target::mourn_inferior (this=0x2fe95c0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>) at ../../src/gdb/linux-nat.c:3609
  loongson#6  0x0000000000e68a40 in target_mourn_inferior (ptid=...) at ../../src/gdb/target.c:2761
  loongson#7  0x0000000000a323ec in linux_nat_target::kill (this=0x2fe95c0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>) at ../../src/gdb/linux-nat.c:3593
  loongson#8  0x0000000000e64d1c in target_kill () at ../../src/gdb/target.c:924
  loongson#9  0x00000000009a19bc in kill_if_already_running (from_tty=1) at ../../src/gdb/infcmd.c:328
  loongson#10 0x00000000009a1a6f in run_command_1 (args=0x0, from_tty=1, run_how=RUN_STOP_AT_MAIN) at ../../src/gdb/infcmd.c:381
  loongson#11 0x00000000009a20a5 in start_command (args=0x0, from_tty=1) at ../../src/gdb/infcmd.c:527
  loongson#12 0x000000000068dc5d in do_simple_func (args=0x0, from_tty=1, c=0x35c7200) at ../../src/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:95

While the second originates from:

  #0  exec_file_attach (filename=0x3d7a1d0 "/tmp/hello.x", from_tty=0) at ../../src/gdb/exec.c:513
  loongson#1  0x0000000000dfe525 in reread_symbols (from_tty=1) at ../../src/gdb/symfile.c:2517
  loongson#2  0x00000000009a1a98 in run_command_1 (args=0x0, from_tty=1, run_how=RUN_STOP_AT_MAIN) at ../../src/gdb/infcmd.c:398
  loongson#3  0x00000000009a20a5 in start_command (args=0x0, from_tty=1) at ../../src/gdb/infcmd.c:527
  loongson#4  0x000000000068dc5d in do_simple_func (args=0x0, from_tty=1, c=0x35c7200) at ../../src/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:95

In the first case the call to exec_file_attach first passes through
reopen_exec_file.  The reopen_exec_file performs a modification time
check on the executable file, and only calls exec_file_attach if the
executable has changed on disk since it was last loaded.

However, in the second case things work a little differently.  In this
case GDB is really trying to reread the debug symbol.  As such, we
iterate over the objfiles list, and for each of those we check the
modification time, if the file on disk has changed then we reload the
debug symbols from that file.

However, there is an additional check, if the objfile has the same
name as the executable then we will call exec_file_attach, but we do
so without checking the cached modification time that indicates when
the executable was last reloaded, as a result, we reload the
executable twice.

In this commit I propose that reread_symbols be changed to
unconditionally call reopen_exec_file before performing the objfile
iteration.  This will ensure that, if the executable has changed, then
the executable will be reloaded, however, if the executable has
already been recently reloaded, we will not reload it for a second
time.

After handling the executable, GDB can then iterate over the objfiles
list and reload them in the normal way.

With this done I now see the executable reloaded only once when GDB
restarts an inferior, which means I can remove the kfail that I added
to the gdb.python/py-exec-file.exp test in the previous commit.

Approved-By: Tom Tromey <[email protected]>
jiegec pushed a commit to jiegec/binutils-gdb that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2023
It was pointed out on the mailing list that a recently added
test (gdb.python/py-progspace-events.exp) was failing when run with
the native-extended-gdbserver board.  This test was added with this
commit:

  commit 59912fb
  Date:   Tue Sep 19 11:45:36 2023 +0100

      gdb: add Python events for program space addition and removal

It turns out though that the test is failing due to a existing bug
in GDB, the new test just exposes the problem.  Additionally, the
failure really doesn't even rely on the new functionality added in the
above commit.  I reduced the test to a simple set of steps that
reproduced the failure and tested against GDB 13, and the test passes;
so the bug was introduced since then.  In fact, the bug was introduced
with this commit:

  commit a282736
  Date:   Fri Sep 8 15:48:16 2023 +0100

      gdb: remove final user of the executable_changed observer

This commit changed how the per-inferior auxv data cache is managed,
specifically, when the cache is cleared, and it is this that leads to
the failure.

This bug is interesting because it exposes a number of issues with
GDB, I'll explain all of the problems I see, though ultimately, I only
propose fixing one problem in this commit, which is enough to resolve
the crash we are currently seeing.

The crash that we are seeing manifests like this:

  ...
  [Inferior 2 (process 3970384) exited normally]
  +inferior 1
  [Switching to inferior 1 [process 3970383] (/tmp/build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.python/py-progspace-events/py-progspace-events)]
  [Switching to thread 1.1 (Thread 3970383.3970383)]
  #0  breakpt () at /tmp/build/gdb/testsuite/../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-progspace-events.c:28
  28	{ /* Nothing.  */ }
  (gdb) step
  +step
  terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gdb_exception_error'

  Fatal signal: Aborted
  ... etc ...

What's happening is that GDB attempts to refill the auxv cache as a
result of the gdbarch_has_shared_address_space call in
program_space::~program_space, the backtrace looks like this:

  #0  0x00007fb4f419a9a5 in raise () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  loongson#1  0x00000000008b635d in handle_fatal_signal (sig=6) at ../../src/gdb/event-top.c:912
  loongson#2  <signal handler called>
  loongson#3  0x00007fb4f38e3625 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  loongson#4  0x00007fb4f38cc8d9 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  loongson#5  0x00007fb4f3c70756 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() [clone .cold] () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6
  loongson#6  0x00007fb4f3c7c6dc in __cxxabiv1::__terminate(void (*)()) () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6
  loongson#7  0x00007fb4f3c7b6e9 in __cxa_call_terminate () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6
  loongson#8  0x00007fb4f3c7c094 in __gxx_personality_v0 () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6
  loongson#9  0x00007fb4f3a80c63 in _Unwind_RaiseException_Phase2 () from /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1
  loongson#10 0x00007fb4f3a8154e in _Unwind_Resume () from /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1
  loongson#11 0x0000000000e8832d in target_read_alloc_1<unsigned char> (ops=0x408a3a0, object=TARGET_OBJECT_AUXV, annex=0x0) at ../../src/gdb/target.c:2266
  loongson#12 0x0000000000e73dea in target_read_alloc (ops=0x408a3a0, object=TARGET_OBJECT_AUXV, annex=0x0) at ../../src/gdb/target.c:2315
  loongson#13 0x000000000058248c in target_read_auxv_raw (ops=0x408a3a0) at ../../src/gdb/auxv.c:379
  loongson#14 0x000000000058243d in target_read_auxv () at ../../src/gdb/auxv.c:368
  loongson#15 0x000000000058255c in target_auxv_search (match=0x0, valp=0x7ffdee17c598) at ../../src/gdb/auxv.c:415
  loongson#16 0x0000000000a464bb in linux_is_uclinux () at ../../src/gdb/linux-tdep.c:433
  loongson#17 0x0000000000a464f6 in linux_has_shared_address_space (gdbarch=0x409a2d0) at ../../src/gdb/linux-tdep.c:440
  loongson#18 0x0000000000510eae in gdbarch_has_shared_address_space (gdbarch=0x409a2d0) at ../../src/gdb/gdbarch.c:4889
  loongson#19 0x0000000000bc7558 in program_space::~program_space (this=0x4544aa0, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at ../../src/gdb/progspace.c:124
  loongson#20 0x00000000009b245d in delete_inferior (inf=0x47b3de0) at ../../src/gdb/inferior.c:290
  loongson#21 0x00000000009b2c10 in prune_inferiors () at ../../src/gdb/inferior.c:480
  loongson#22 0x00000000009c5e3e in fetch_inferior_event () at ../../src/gdb/infrun.c:4558
  loongson#23 0x000000000099b4dc in inferior_event_handler (event_type=INF_REG_EVENT) at ../../src/gdb/inf-loop.c:42
  loongson#24 0x0000000000cbc64f in remote_async_serial_handler (scb=0x4090a30, context=0x408a6b0) at ../../src/gdb/remote.c:14859
  loongson#25 0x0000000000d83d3a in run_async_handler_and_reschedule (scb=0x4090a30) at ../../src/gdb/ser-base.c:138
  loongson#26 0x0000000000d83e1f in fd_event (error=0, context=0x4090a30) at ../../src/gdb/ser-base.c:189

So this is problem loongson#1, if we throw an exception while deleting a
program_space then this is not caught, and is going to crash GDB.

Problem loongson#2 becomes evident when we ask why GDB is throwing an error in
this case; the error is thrown because the remote target, operating in
non-async mode, can't read the auxv data while an inferior is running
and GDB is waiting for a stop reply.  The problem here then, is why
does GDB get into a position where it tries to interact with the
remote target in this way, at this time?  The problem is caused by the
prune_inferiors call which can be seen in the above backtrace.

In prune_inferiors we check if the inferior is deletable, and if it
is, we delete it.  The problem is, I think, we should also check if
the target is currently in a state that would allow us to delete the
inferior.  We don't currently have such a check available, we'd need
to add one, but for the remote target, this would return false if the
remote is in async mode and the remote is currently waiting for a stop
reply.  With this change in place GDB would defer deleting the
inferior until the remote target has stopped, at which point GDB would
be able to refill the auxv cache successfully.

And then, problem loongson#3 becomes evident when we ask why GDB is needing to
refill the auxv cache now when it didn't need to for GDB 13.  This is
where the second commit mentioned above (a282736) comes in.
Prior to this commit, the auxv cache was cleared by the
executable_changed observer, while after that commit the auxv cache
was cleared by the new_objfile observer -- but only when the
new_objfile observer is used in the special mode that actually means
that all objfiles have been unloaded (I know, the overloading of the
new_objfile observer is horrible, and unnecessary, but it's not really
important for this bug).

The difference arises because the new_objfile observer is triggered
from clear_symtab_users, which in turn is called from
program_space::~program_space.  The new_objfile observer for auxv does
this:

  static void
  auxv_new_objfile_observer (struct objfile *objfile)
  {
    if (objfile == nullptr)
      invalidate_auxv_cache_inf (current_inferior ());
  }

That is, when all the objfiles are unloaded, we clear the auxv cache
for the current inferior.

The problem is, then when we look at the prune_inferiors ->
delete_inferior -> ~program_space path, we see that the current
inferior is not going to be an inferior that exists within the
program_space being deleted; delete_inferior removes the deleted
inferior from the global inferior list, and then only deletes the
program_space if program_space::empty() returns true, which is only
the case if the current inferior isn't within the program_space to
delete, and no other inferior exists within that program_space
either.

What this means is that when the new_objfile observer is called we
can't rely on the current inferior having any relationship with the
program space in which the objfiles were removed.  This was an error
in the commit a282736, the only thing we can rely on is the
current program space.  As a result of this mistake, after commit
a282736, GDB was sometimes clearing the auxv cache for a random
inferior.  In the native target case this was harmless as we can
always refill the cache when needed, but in the remote target case, if
we need to refill the cache when the remote target is executing, then
we get the crash we observed.

And additionally, if we think about this a little more, we see that
commit a282736 made another mistake.  When all the objfiles are
removed, they are removed from a program_space, a program_space might
contain multiple inferiors, so surely, we should clear the auxv cache
for all of the matching inferiors?

Given these two insights, that the current_inferior is not relevant,
only the current_program_space, and that we should be clearing the
cache for all inferiors in the current_program_space, we can update
auxv_new_objfile_observer to:

  if (objfile == nullptr)
    {
      for (inferior *inf : all_inferiors ())
	{
	  if (inf->pspace == current_program_space)
	    invalidate_auxv_cache_inf (inf);
	}
    }

With this change we now correctly clear the auxv cache for the correct
inferiors, and GDB no longer needs to refill the cache at an
inconvenient time, this avoids the crash we were seeing.

And finally, we reach problem loongson#4.  Inspired by the observation that
using the current_inferior from within the ~program_space function was
not correct, I added some debug to see if current_inferior() was
called anywhere else (below ~program_space), and the answer is yes,
it's called a often.  Mostly the culprit is GDB doing:

  current_inferior ()->top_target ()-> ....

But I think all of these calls are most likely doing the wrong thing,
and only work because the top target in all these cases is shared
between all inferiors, e.g. it's the native target, or the remote
target for all inferiors.  But if we had a truly multi-connection
setup, then we might start to see odd behaviour.

Problem loongson#1 I'm just ignoring for now, I guess at some point we might
run into this again, and then we'd need to solve this.  But in this
case I wasn't sure what a "good" solution would look like.  We need
the auxv data in order to implement the linux_is_uclinux() function.
If we can't get the auxv data then what should we do, assume yes, or
assume no?  The right answer would probably be to propagate the error
back up the stack, but then we reach ~program_space, and throwing
exceptions from a destructor is problematic, so we'd need to catch and
deal at this point.  The linux_is_uclinux() call is made from within
gdbarch_has_shared_address_space(), which is used like:

  if (!gdbarch_has_shared_address_space (target_gdbarch ()))
    delete this->aspace;

So, we would have to choose; delete the address space or not.  If we
delete it on error, then we might delete an address space that is
shared within another program space.  If we don't delete the address
space, then we might leak it.  Neither choice is great.

A better solution might be to have the address spaces be reference
counted, then we could remove the gdbarch_has_shared_address_space
call completely, and just rely on the reference count to auto-delete
the address space when appropriate.

The solution for problem loongson#2 I already hinted at above, we should have
a new target_can_delete_inferiors() call, which should be called from
prune_inferiors, this would prevent GDB from trying to delete
inferiors when a (remote) target is in a state where we know it can't
delete the inferior.  Deleting an inferior often (always?) requires
sending packets to the remote, and if the remote is waiting for a stop
reply then this will never work, so the pruning should be deferred in
this case.

The solution for problem loongson#3 is included in this commit.

And, for problem loongson#4, I'm not sure what the right solution is.  Maybe
delete_inferior should ensure the inferior to be deleted is in place
when ~program_space is called?  But that seems a little weird, as the
current inferior would, in theory, still be using the current
program_space...

Anyway, after this commit, the gdb.python/py-progspace-events.exp test
now passes when run with the native-extended-remote board.

Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30935
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <[email protected]>
Change-Id: I41f0e6e2d7ecc1e5e55ec170f37acd4052f46eaf
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant