You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have been getting user references via this github issue. The general process is to either post a message there or email me.
Towards the end of the year, @achrinza suggested to better document this user reference process, so that everyone (users and maintainers) know how to proceed.
There are mainly two things we're looking for user/company who would like to showcase their company in our web site because of their LoopBack usage.
1/ company logo to put on the main page "Who's using LoopBack?" section
2/ Optionally, a few sentences about their usage and experience with LoopBack - to be added in https://loopback.io/what-our-users-say.html.
Proposal
So far, we've been having good experience with the community in getting their reference. I'm thinking whether it would be even better to ask them to submit PRs to update our web site with their references. As maintainers would still be the ones who're approving (and rejecting) the PR, we can do our own validations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Background
We have been getting user references via this github issue. The general process is to either post a message there or email me.
Towards the end of the year, @achrinza suggested to better document this user reference process, so that everyone (users and maintainers) know how to proceed.
There are mainly two things we're looking for user/company who would like to showcase their company in our web site because of their LoopBack usage.
1/ company logo to put on the main page "Who's using LoopBack?" section
2/ Optionally, a few sentences about their usage and experience with LoopBack - to be added in https://loopback.io/what-our-users-say.html.
Proposal
So far, we've been having good experience with the community in getting their reference. I'm thinking whether it would be even better to ask them to submit PRs to update our web site with their references. As maintainers would still be the ones who're approving (and rejecting) the PR, we can do our own validations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: