We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Super-resolution not completely respecting input low resolution image
Source: https://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~vgg/data/voxceleb/vox2.html
Note: There are other instances where it does follow the low input resolution image quite well.
unet0 = NullUnet() # add a placeholder "null" unet for the base unet unet1 = Unet( dim = unet_dim, cond_dim = 512, dim_mults = (1, 2, 4, 8), num_resnet_blocks = 3, layer_attns = (False, True, True, True), layer_cross_attns = (False, True, True, True) ) unet2 = Unet( dim = 128, cond_dim = 512, dim_mults = (1, 2, 4, 8), num_resnet_blocks = (2, 4, 8, 8), layer_attns = (False, False, False, True), layer_cross_attns = (False, False, False, True) ) imagen = Imagen( unets = (unet0,unet1, unet2), image_sizes = (8,64, 128), timesteps = 1000, cond_drop_prob = 0.1 ).cuda()`
This images are sampled from the first super-resolution UNet only.
Is there any way to make it follow the low resolution image more closely, i.e parameter tuning ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Super-resolution not completely respecting input low resolution image
Source: https://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~vgg/data/voxceleb/vox2.html
Note: There are other instances where it does follow the low input resolution image quite well.
This images are sampled from the first super-resolution UNet only.
Is there any way to make it follow the low resolution image more closely, i.e parameter tuning ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: