Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential bug in granularity check #10

Open
tabiosg opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Potential bug in granularity check #10

tabiosg opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@tabiosg
Copy link

tabiosg commented Apr 1, 2024

Is there a purpose for why the two if statements are separated and have the same conditions? I would assume that this line intended to be

if (pointer(A_true)->size +
            pointer(B_true)->size +
            pointer(C_true)->size > granularity)
        {

instead of

if (pointer(A_false)->size +
            pointer(B_false)->size +
            pointer(C_false)->size > granularity)
        {

pointer(C_false)->size > granularity)

@luigicapogrosso
Copy link
Owner

Dear @tabiosg, thank you. We will thoroughly review the information you gave us and update you.

@luigicapogrosso luigicapogrosso self-assigned this Apr 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants