Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Model blending using only 1_F is better than using all three networks in level1. #5

Open
mariolew opened this issue Mar 3, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@mariolew
Copy link

mariolew commented Mar 3, 2016

When I test level1, I found that using 1_F only is better than using 1_F + 1_EN + 1_NM. By the way, the loss of 1_EN and 1_NM is also pretty low. If I use 1_F only for the first level, I got reasonable good result from level3... I just can't understand why 1_F only would be better than blending of three networks.

@luoyetx
Copy link
Owner

luoyetx commented Mar 3, 2016

Yes, I found this problem too :(

So, I didn't train model 1_EN and 1_NM. Maybe the processing part of 1_EN or 1_NM are not good or still need some training trick to train these two model well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants