Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Logic: Player-NPC Interaction #22

Open
macskay opened this issue May 5, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Logic: Player-NPC Interaction #22

macskay opened this issue May 5, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels
Enhancement Logic
Milestone
0.3.0

Comments

@macskay
Copy link
Owner

macskay commented May 5, 2015

A player should be able to talk to an NPC. When this happens the NPC stops walking.
The NPC should respond with an answer getting it randomly from a set of anwers.
After the converstaion has ended the NPC resumes walking around.

Later there will be special NPC. They won't reply with a ransom answer but for now we just need some supernumeraries
@macskay macskay added this to the 0.1.0 (First Level) milestone May 5, 2015
mvmntjulz added a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2015
@mvmntjulz
-#22 - NPC creation
ffafc8e 
-#22 - NPC has response message.
@mvmntjulz mvmntjulz mentioned this issue May 8, 2015
Merged
@mvmntjulz
Copy link
Collaborator

NPC with response message has been added

mvmntjulz added a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2015
@mvmntjulz
Merge pull request #39 from mkli90/enhancement/22-NPC-Creation
7fb27f4 
#22 - NPC creation
@macskay macskay modified the milestones: 0.2.0 - (FirstLevel), 0.1.0 - (Prolog) May 9, 2015
@macskay macskay changed the title Player-NPC Interaction Logic: Player-NPC Interaction May 14, 2015
@macskay macskay added the Logic label May 14, 2015
@macskay macskay modified the milestones: 0.3.0, 0.2.0 May 17, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Enhancement Logic
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.3.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@macskay @mvmntjulz