Replies: 1 comment 8 replies
-
Hi @gsbox, I had a quick look at the log and your template and everything seems to be ok. Note that you can directly control your FSR14 instead of using virtual buttons using this other solution discussed here. In my opinion, that's why you should not use the same sender ID as FHEM if you want to use virtual buttons, unless you reset the FSR14 and do the pairing again with the virtual button. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi.
I've got some FSR14-4 Devices in my Weberhaus, and i am trying to convert my Smarthome from FHEM to HA. I installed this addon and it seems to boot up just fine (logs attached).
I also wrote a script for the switch
`switch:
switches:
az_licht:
friendly_name: Arbeitszimmer Licht
value_template: "{{ is_state('binary_sensor.e2m_az_licht_bo_pressed', 'on') }}"
turn_on:
- service: select.select_option
data:
option: BO
target:
entity_id: select.e2m_v_az_licht_action
turn_off:
- service: select.select_option
data:
option: BI
target:
entity_id: select.e2m_v_az_licht_action`
An i created the necessary devices (i hope) in enoceanmqtt.devices
`[az_licht]
address = 0xFFD7BC11
rorg = 0xF6
func = 0x02
type = 0x02.
[v_az_licht]
address = 0xFFFFFFFF
rorg = 0xF6
func = 0x02
type = 0x01
sender = 0xFF834381
virtual = 1`
When i turn the Switch, it stays there for approx. 2 seconds and then returns. The light stays off. Nothing to be seen, but the log seems to say, that the request was ok.
Is it a problem, that the sender-id of the virtual device was already in use through FHEM? This system is not running, while testing HA.
I'd really appreciate a hint, what i do wrong. From my humble opinion, there should be no problem in using the already working virtual-IDs from FHEM, right ?
Thanks for your help. If i can provide more detailed information, please let me know.
enoceanmqtt.log
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions