Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove direct calls to presenter from cut viewer view #38197

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RichardWaiteSTFC
Copy link
Contributor

Description of work

Remove direct calls to presenter from cut viewer view for MVP training.
This is blocked by #38101(which must be merged first)

Fixes #38102

To test:

(1) Follow manual testing instructions
https://developer.mantidproject.org/Testing/SliceViewer/SliceViewer.html#cutviewer-tool

This does not require release notes because internal change, users shouldn't notice difference


Reviewer

Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.

Code Review

  • Is the code of an acceptable quality?
  • Does the code conform to the coding standards?
  • Are the unit tests small and test the class in isolation?
  • If there is GUI work does it follow the GUI standards?
  • If there are changes in the release notes then do they describe the changes appropriately?
  • Do the release notes conform to the release notes guide?

Functional Tests

  • Do changes function as described? Add comments below that describe the tests performed?
  • Do the changes handle unexpected situations, e.g. bad input?
  • Has the relevant (user and developer) documentation been added/updated?

Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of @mantidproject/gatekeepers will take care of it.

Gatekeeper

If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.

RichardWaiteSTFC and others added 4 commits October 14, 2024 16:11
Co-authored-by: JackEAllen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: samtygier-stfc  <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by:Adriazalvarez<[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JackEAllen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: samtygier-stfc  <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by:Adriazalvarez<[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JackEAllen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: samtygier-stfc  <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by:Adriazalvarez<[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JackEAllen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: samtygier-stfc <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adriazalvarez <[email protected]>
@RichardWaiteSTFC RichardWaiteSTFC added the ISIS Team: Core Issue and pull requests managed by the Core subteam at ISIS label Oct 15, 2024
@RichardWaiteSTFC RichardWaiteSTFC added this to the Release 6.12 milestone Oct 15, 2024
RichardWaiteSTFC and others added 2 commits October 15, 2024 17:39
Co-authored-by: JackEAllen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: samtygier-stfc <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adriazalvarez <[email protected]>

Also made explicit `representation_params` returned and passed to various methods
Co-authored-by: JackEAllen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: samtygier-stfc <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adriazalvarez <[email protected]>
This involved refactoring cut representation to work only with basis vectors, extents etc. in the 2D slice - so as to avoid having to retrieve 3rd integrated dim from view in update_bin_params_from_cut_representation
Also updated tests and fixed failing test
@robertapplin
Copy link
Contributor

I think this needs rebasing on main now that the prior PR has been merged. When its rebased I will review!

@robertapplin robertapplin self-assigned this Oct 22, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts label Oct 29, 2024
Copy link

👋 Hi, @RichardWaiteSTFC,

Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts ISIS Team: Core Issue and pull requests managed by the Core subteam at ISIS
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CutViewerView communicates with SliceViewer(Presenter)
4 participants