You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering how I can actually interpret these bayes scoring?
If I compare it to the ranks running HB Sawtooth I found a quite close match. However, Sawtooth also provides probability scores as well as zero-anchored interval scores.
I thought that these bayes scores can be treated as raw logits scores and could easily be transformed to probability scores, either by the formula provided by Sawtooth (https://sawtoothsoftware.com/help/lighthouse-studio/manual/hid_web_maxdiff_hbv4.html?anchor=transformingweightsto0-100 , see "Transforming Weights to 0-100 Scale") or just running exp() and divide it by the sum(exp()) of all other item scores. However, when using these formulas the range is within 1 to 2% for all items, which seems odd.
Thanks a lot for the help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey,
I was wondering how I can actually interpret these bayes scoring?
If I compare it to the ranks running HB Sawtooth I found a quite close match. However, Sawtooth also provides probability scores as well as zero-anchored interval scores.
I thought that these bayes scores can be treated as raw logits scores and could easily be transformed to probability scores, either by the formula provided by Sawtooth (https://sawtoothsoftware.com/help/lighthouse-studio/manual/hid_web_maxdiff_hbv4.html?anchor=transformingweightsto0-100 , see "Transforming Weights to 0-100 Scale") or just running exp() and divide it by the sum(exp()) of all other item scores. However, when using these formulas the range is within 1 to 2% for all items, which seems odd.
Thanks a lot for the help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: