Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pyQA400 against QA401 #1

Open
streboryaj opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

pyQA400 against QA401 #1

streboryaj opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@streboryaj
Copy link

First off, thank you for creating these bindings!

I am attempting to use them to talk to a QA401.
I did not compile them, I have used the binaries you created. I moved the QAAnalyzer.exe to C:\Program Files\QuantAsylum\QA400 directory so it could be found.
When I run the QA400_test.py, it finds the application, launches it, and runs the first test, then:

$ python QA400_test.py

Unhandled Exception: System.MissingMethodException: Method not found: 'System.Drawing.PointF[] Com.QuantAsylum.QA400Interface.GetData(ChannelType)'.
   at QA400API.ComputeTHDPctOnLastData(ChannelType channel, Double fundamental, Double maxFreq)

I am running on 32-bit Windows XP with Python 3.3.4

Do I need to attempt to re-compile everything on my machine (would that even help?) or do you think there is another solution?

Thanks for your help!

@markmelvin
Copy link
Owner

Hi There,

I have not tried to use the API with a QA401 (I didn't know they were out yet - cool!). I think we would need to confirm with QuantAsylum that the same API works. I have a feeling this isn't going to "just work". They likely have a different API that goes along with the 401 that will need to be wrapped separately.

Mark.

@streboryaj
Copy link
Author

OK, thanks for the reply.
I jave emailed Quant Asylum to see if there is a new dll.

jay

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Mark Melvin [email protected]
wrote:

Hi There,

I have not tried to use the API with a QA401 (I didn't know they were out
yet - cool!). I think we would need to confirm with QuantAsylum that the
same API works. I have a feeling this isn't going to "just work". They
likely have a different API that goes along with the 401 that will need to
be wrapped separately.

Mark.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants